In the recent Joker/Daffy Duck comic (Side Note: The latest batch of DC/WB crossovers are neither especially good or especially bad), there's a scene in which the Joker kills the patrons of a comedy club and has his gang take their stuff (Another Side Note: Who in the Blue Hell would go to a comedy club in Gotham City? That's just asking for trouble!), and this scene inspired in me a sudden realization.

Now, I'll say up front that I'm sure I'm not the first person to have this realization (or the tenth, or the hundredth, or the thousandth...), it's just something that I never really thought about all that much before.

Anyway, the great realization was this:  

There's no (expletive gerund omitted) way that someone wouldn't have killed the Joker by now.  Victim's grieving relative, vigilante, fed-up cop, "accident in the cells", a villain who's sick of the Joker's crap - someone would have wasted him by now.   I can no longer sustain my suspension of disbelief as regards this character.

 

Views: 3380

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's definitely implausible, and a good argument against superhero universes in general. A character like Batman shouldn't have casual access to the kinds of resources that dwarf his own abilities, if we want to take him and his struggles seriously. To enjoy a Batman comic, it's best to forget that he's a member of the JLA, unless the story at hand brings it up. 

If you pay too much attention to the "grand tapestry" of the DCU or the Marvel Universe, it interferes with enjoyment of individual stories, especially those of a smaller scale.

Captain Comics said:

I've long believed that Barbara's best destiny was as Oracle. But it is equally true that it was implausible that a member of the Bat-family suffered in a world with all those potential fixes.

I can hold both opinions. Do I contradict myself? So I do. I am vast, I contain multitudes.

I always thought that Oracle was a wonderful way to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, and that Barbara would and should have remained Oracle even if she regained her mobility.

I completely agree. Or at least it would be great to see her using her Oracle skills in the field as Batgirl, at the very least.

ClarkKent_DC said:

I always thought that Oracle was a wonderful way to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear, and that Barbara would and should have remained Oracle even if she regained her mobility.

Couldn't we say the same thing about our world? We have scientific and medical advancements beyond what seems possible.

And yet, we have people living in filth in certain countries of the world.

Sorry, not trying to get political. I'm just playing devil's advocate for the sake of discussion.

Captain Comics said:

I've long believed that Barbara's best destiny was as Oracle. But it is equally true that it was implausible that a member of the Bat-family suffered in a world with all those potential fixes.

By the way, no matter how you slice it, the Joker still doesn't deserve the special protection and treatment that Batman gives him.

I saw what you did there ...

Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man said:

By the way, no matter how you slice it, the Joker still doesn't deserve the special protection and treatment that Batman gives him.

Also, there's no way that Johnny Storm burned off Namor's beard without doing serious damage to his face.

It's a good argument in general. But those people living in filth aren't personal friends with half the Justice League. She isn't just a random Bangladeshi; she's among the global elite. And the elite take care of their own. Even if she was too proud to ask Superman or Wonder Woman for help, Batman would do it for her.

Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man said:

Couldn't we say the same thing about our world? We have scientific and medical advancements beyond what seems possible.

And yet, we have people living in filth in certain countries of the world.

Sorry, not trying to get political. I'm just playing devil's advocate for the sake of discussion.

Captain Comics said:

I've long believed that Barbara's best destiny was as Oracle. But it is equally true that it was implausible that a member of the Bat-family suffered in a world with all those potential fixes.

Agreed. I could barely stretch my suspension of disbelief when Batman saves Joker from falling off a building or whatever, because he will save anybody he can. But it really has become special protection above and beyond (See Tom King's Batman #49). And I can't buy that.

Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man said:

By the way, no matter how you slice it, the Joker still doesn't deserve the special protection and treatment that Batman gives him.

Steve Ditko's Mr. A let a criminal fall off a building and later let some others drown. The second one way have been The Question, or both characters. He didn't kill them, he just didn't save them when he presumably could. The Azrael Batman let a serial killer fall into, IIRC, a fiery cauldron of something or other. Same thing. Both were considered very edgy, even though they didn't actually (hands-on) kill the criminals. I think it can be justifiably stated that saving the Joker equals being guilty of all his future murders, just so Bruce Wayne can feel blameless. 

Captain Comics said:

Agreed. I could barely stretch my suspension of disbelief when Batman saves Joker from falling off a building or whatever, because he will save anybody he can. But it really has become special protection above and beyond (See Tom King's Batman #49). And I can't buy that.

Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man said:

By the way, no matter how you slice it, the Joker still doesn't deserve the special protection and treatment that Batman gives him.

Daredevil let Bullseye fall, too.

Then, later, played Russian roulette with him using an unloaded gun.

I always pronounced "Gyrich" as "Girrick", but I just saw an excerpt from an X-Men picture, and they pronounced  it "Guy Rich", and maybe that's the way it's supposed to pronounced, but it still sounds wrong to me.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Luke Blanchard replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Fixed Points in Time
"In the Amazing-Man story in Amazing Man Comics #8 (1939) Aman responds to news reports of…"
1 hour ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man's discussion What Comic Books Have You Read Today?
"BINGE BOOKS: Startup #2, Super Suckers #2 and Z-People #1 all shipped yesterday. I never did buy…"
7 hours ago
Lee Houston, Junior replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Once again, war maybe hell, but it can also be weird! (Image courtesy of the Grand Comics…"
8 hours ago
Steve W replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
9 hours ago
Richard Willis replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Two tryouts for a series that AFAIK never happened"
9 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to The Baron's discussion 'Are Newspapers Dying?' Thread
"The Poynter Institute, a think tank that focuses on journalism, takes note of the fact that several…"
11 hours ago
Philip Portelli replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"bbbbb"
12 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to Emerkeith Davyjack's discussion All-purpose newspaper strips discussion
"Bound & Gagged was initially about doing silent sight gags, of the type Sergio…"
15 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Star Trek: Discovery
"SPECIES TEN-C: As Discovery approaches the hypersphere, there is no response to any of the hails.…"
15 hours ago
Peter Wrexham replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Another character not often associated with Joe Kubert's work."
16 hours ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion Movies I Have Seen Lately
"O Hai Munsters!"
16 hours ago
Fraser Sherman replied to The Baron's discussion Movies I Have Seen Lately
"Yeah, Rob Zombie is not the person I'd pick for that genre. Here Come the Munsters from the…"
16 hours ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service