Replies

  • It's looking pretty clear that Brightest Day doesn't necessarily mean what people were assuming.

    As for the Green Arrow cover -- it looks representative of the comic inside, judging by the previews in the end of this week's DC books -- GA fighting what looks to be a rape gang. I'd rather have that parent pass it up because of the cover than buy it and show the kid what's inside.

    Personally, I'm completely cool with GA being a mature readers book -- he's got a history of it, and this cover doesn't indicate otherwise. He doesn't even *look* like the B&B Green Arrow. It's not what I'm interested in, long-term, but there could be a decent audience for it. Since Batman is too high-profile for the job, Green Arrow is perfect to be treated like DC's version of Daredevil. Street-level, morally gray intrigue and action.

    Which means, marketing aside, they're probably doing the stories a disservice by tying them in with Brightest Day. An urban Robin Hood is cool, until he comes face to face with aliens that vomit liquid rage. Why bother rebuilding the concept if you're just going to dilute it with the overall DCU ridiculousness?
  • Remember all the criticism about Batman even being in the JLA! That never really happened to GA!
  • I'm certainly not against adult stories using superheroes...but it always bothers me when characters are used that are simultaneously being featured in media for kids. Now, you could make the same argument about Wolverine or Lobo (now a gym teacher in Tiny Titans)...but they both started "life" as hard edge characters. You could also argue that, ever since the Adams-O'Neil stuff, Ollie has a long history of more mature stories...only solidified by Grell's work.

    I may have convinced myself that this is OK...

    The brutality of the cover still bugs me, though...
  • Someone's gonna see this and convince themselves that DC is mocking Jesus.
  • Mocking Jesus?

    Jesus wishes he had a boxing glove arrow!
  • Doc said:Hey, kids, welcome to Brightest Day! Can't wait for that parent to come into the shop with a seven year old looking for comics starring that cool Green Arrow from the Brave and the Bold cartoon!

    Well, if you stand back and look at the Brave and Bold cartoon objectively without the superhero-love, it's way to violent for 7 year olds. All problems aresolved by punch-ups and force, even friends greet each other with some form of violence.

    Which never has any lasting consequences.

    Those messages are very unhealthy for growing minds.
  • You've got me there, Charlie. But I figure he can take it.
  • I don't really see any Christ imagery in the cover, though it's hardly PG either. Green Arrow uses weapons that causes puncture wounds so there is a double standard as to what is or isn't acceptable violence. DC masked it with trick arrows but there is no way to knock someone out with a regular arrow. It's what kept GA out of cartoons for most of the last 40 years. That's why he wasn't in "Challenge of the Super Friends".

    He may an urban hunter but I see him more as a modern crusader, fighting for the defenseless against those who would try to exploit, criminally or politically. He may wound his enemies even though it would easier to simply kill them. That's why he's a hero!
  • He's been turned back into Robin Hood.

    It's a tie-in to Brightest Day because it takes place the the new Forest in the middle of Star City that was created by Boston Brand in Brightest Day #0.

    "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -Groucho Marx

    Check out the Secret Headquarters (my store) website! it's much better now!

    Listen to WOXY.com, it's the future of rock-n-roll!


  • Rob Staeger said:
    You've got me there, Charlie. But I figure he can take it.

    The Good Lord with his long flowing locks, mocks follicly challenged iconoclasts, Rob.

    :-P
This reply was deleted.