Deck Log Entry # 182 Mysteries of the Silver Age (Part Two)

Welcome back!  We’ve been talking about unusual deviations that appeared in Silver-Age comics without an explanation---at least, not from an authoritative source.  Last time out, we discussed the curious case of the adult Robin’s first costume, which changed between consecutive JLA issues with nary a reason given, in or out of the story.  And then there was the matter of the Elongated Man’s second costume, which underwent a colour change that went equally unexplained.  In fact, no-one seemed to even notice.


Cannily, Philip Portelli was able to suggest a possible motivation for the altered hue of the E-Man’s duds, one that makes sense.  That’s one of the reasons I broached this subject as a Deck Log Entry; hoping you guys might have some information I missed.  Or at least, a good idea, like Philip did.  Now I have two final mysteries to percolate your brain cells.  One is another costume alteration; the second is something to which the expression “right in front of one’s face” applies literally.



3.  The Mystery of the Half-Masked Panther.


In Fantastic Four # 52 (Jul., 1966), we are introduced to the Black Panther, the ceremonial guise of Prince T’Challa, leader of the African nation of Wakanda.  At T'Challa's invitation, the Fantastic Four travel to Wakanda, where they are separated and attacked individually by the Panther.  Despite the hostile introductions, the Black Panther is one of the good guys.  He needs the FF’s help, if the foursome lives up to their reputations.  They do.


Beneath the full-face mask, T’Challa is a native African male and the first black super-hero not just at Marvel, but in mainstream American comics.  Comic-book fans who came along after the 1960’s have no idea what such a distinction wrought.


Following the next-issue conclusion of his inaugural adventure, the Black Panther became a recurring member of the Fantastic Four’s rapidly expanding cast.  His status as a head of state and the sophisticated technology at his disposal made him an invaluable ally to the F.F.  On our side of the four-colour pages, the readers’ reactions were heavily positive, so the only tweaking to be done was minor:  the military-style half-cape the Panther wore in his first couple of appearances was dropped, giving him a sleeker image in the black bodysuit which covered him from head to toe.


Over the rest of 1966 and into the next year, the Black Panther participated in four more issues of Fantastic Four, including 1967’s King-Size Special.  But there were plans afoot to promote the Panther from supporting character to regular star.  First, though, the groundwork had to be laid---by teaming the Prince of the Wakandas with Captain America in a four-part epic that began in Tales of Suspense # 97 (Jan., 1968) and ended in Captain America (ToS, after a title-change) # 100 (Apr., 1968).  This made it logical for Cap---whom Roy Thomas was moving out of the Avengers—to recommend the Panther as his replacement, in The Avengers # 51.


A nomination by the Living Legend of World War II is a golden ticket.  T’Challa joins the Assemblers in issue # 52 (May, 1968).  And here is where the mystery begins.  Don’t get ahead of me, though.  As I discovered, it’s a twisted skein, indeed.


Marvel mavens must have been puzzled by the appearance of the Black Panther on the cover of issue #52.  Or, rather, by the change in his ceremonial costume.  Instead of a full-faced cowl, the Panther wore the half-mask type that had been a fashion statement for super-heroes since the Batman swung across the cover of Detective Comics # 27.


And it wasn’t just a goof on the cover.  Inside, the Panther wore the half-mask on the splash page and throughout the rest of the book.  Despite the story's expositional material detailing T’Challa’s history, no mention was made of the new mask.  Marvel fans, accustomed to the company’s continued stories and eventual loose-end tying, probably figured, O.K., they’ll explain the half-mask next issue.


The abbreviated mask returned in The Avengers # 53 (Jun., 1968), and still no in-story reason provided.  Nor was it explained in issues # 54 or # 55.  The interesting part was that Stan Lee wasn’t telling us why the Panther’s mask was changed, either.  That was unusual for Lee, who was generally responsive to readers’ questions.


However, when the mail over the Panther’s début as an Avenger began to appear in the letter columns, it appeared that Stan had nothing to respond to.  Not one fan said a word about the new half-mask.  It wasn’t until the “Avengers Assemble” letter column in issue # 55 that two missives---one from  Lee Gray, of Detroit, Michigan, and one from Tommy Floyd, of Andrews, Texas---pointed out the new mask and argued for the return of the old one.


In reply, the Smilin’ One pledged that the Black Panther’s full-faced cowl would return in the next issue.  He didn’t say anything, though, about why T’Challa had worn a half-mask for four issues.  The closest Stan came to suggesting anything at all about the mask alteration came in The Avengers # 56 (Sep., 1968), when, as promised, the Panther was back in his all-concealing mask---permanently.  In the lettercol, Lee stated for the record:


The only printed letters that addressed the change in the Panther’s mask simply asked for the old one back.  Whatever “controversy” there was about it, Stan wasn’t telling.  Nor was he telling why the change was made in the first place.



Unlike the changes in the adult Robin’s costume, or turning the Elongated Man’s outfit magenta, the half-mask business is a well-known part of the Black Panther’s history.  Every reference page or Black Panther-related blog that I’ve reviewed has made mention of the brief half-mask period.  Which makes it even more curious that no-one in authority---such as Stan Lee himself---has ever stated the reason for it.  There is a popular conjecture, though, that most folks feel makes sense.


The conventional consensus goes something like this:


Stan Lee created the first mainstream-comics black super-hero, but because of the character’s full-face mask, only dedicated Marvel fans knew it.  Casual readers, checking out the covers or flipping through the pages, wouldn’t necessarily have realised it.  Stan was strong for promoting the Marvel brand as forward-thinking and socially aware.  (Nor, to be honest, was he above patting himself on the back.)  So, Lee had the Panther’s mask changed to reveal his ebony skin.  Then, even someone just passing by the spinner rack could see that Marvel Comics had a black hero, and in one of its most popular titles, yet.


After enough complaints about T’Challa wearing the wrong mask, Stan acquiesced and restored the original full-face cowl.  But that was O.K.; by then, everybody knew that the Panther was a black man.



It made sense to me, too---until I started researching the history of the Black Panther, and discovered an interesting wrinkle.  One that reärranges the conventional thinking a bit.


The first part, you probably already know.  A well-worn behind-the-scenes story has it that, when Stan Lee asked Jack Kirby to design an African super-hero for an issue of Fantastic Four, Kirby came up with “the Coal Tiger”.  Lee found the name and the visual a bit over the top, and he told Jack to give it another go.


Here’s the part you might not know.  Kirby’s second stab resulted in the character of the Black Panther and the familiar ebony costume---except that Jack wanted it evident that the Panther was black.  So he provided the Panther with a Batman-type half-cowl that exposed his lower face and jaw.  That’s right, gang---the half-mask was the original version!


This can be seen in Kirby’s first draught for the cover of Fantastic Four # 52.  Now, I’m not sure why Stan rejected this first effort; it looks perfectly serviceable to me, although admittedly, the cover that saw print had a moodier quality.  But before the issue went to press, Lee had all of the panels displaying the Black Panther’s masked face redrawn---or, more accurately, filled in---to give him a full-face cowl, concealing all of his features, including skin colour.


As in the other instance, I was unable to track down an authoritative explanation for why this was done.  But also as before, there is a logical surmise.


In creating the first super-hero of African origin, Marvel was willing to go out on a limb---but not too far out.  Someone---either Stan Lee or publisher Martin Goodman---got cold feet over the controversy that was likely to erupt, especially from the southern distributors, over introducing a prominent black hero.  Yeah, we’ll do it, but let’s not make it so obvious that he’s black.  Hence, the redrawn full-face mask.  Sure, there were still plenty of panels showing a maskless T’Challa, prince of the Wakandas, as the Panther, but you really had to read the story to find them.  And it wasn’t the readers that Lee or Goodman or whomever was worried about; they would be on-board with the idea.  Rather, it was the southern distributor who looked at the cover and maybe flipped through a page or two that they had to slip past.


It’s also likely that, in the Panther’s subsequent appearances in Fantastic Four and Tales of Suspense, Jack Kirby persisted in giving T’Challa the half-mask, forcing Stan to keep having the inkers turn it into an all-concealing one.  At least one instance of a Kirby-drawn half-mask slipped by Lee’s watchful eye, in a panel from Fantastic Four # 60 (Mar., 1967):


That changes the circumstances behind the Black Panther’s half-mask in his first few Avengers appearances.  It wasn’t a new modification; rather, it was a return to the mask that Kirby had originally envisioned for the character.  Why penciller John Buscema, the first artist after Kirby to draw the Panther, used the half-mask, we can only guess.  Maybe he got a model sheet for the Panther from Jack. 


Nor do we know why Stan Lee allowed Buscema’s half-mask to stand.  Perhaps, at that point, Stan figured the social climate in America had shifted enough that it was safe to ballyhoo the Panther’s race.  If so, then there’s a certain irony in the fact reader demand forced him to restore T’Challa’s “original” mask.




4.  The Mystery of the Turnabout Hair.


Silver-Age DC fans might not have known his name, but to them, Curt Swan was “the good Superman artist”.


For over a quarter of a century, Swan’s rendition of the Man of Steel stood as the definitive model, the one everybody thought of when they thought of Superman.  Like any skilled illustrator, Swan refined the quality of his output over the years, but his Superman---while his hair might get slightly thicker or his waist a tad slimmer, to reflect the times---remained virtually unchanged.


Not surprisingly, when editor Mort Weisinger, or his successor, Julius Schwartz, had a couple of pages to fill, Swan’s model sheets were often employed as a “How to Draw Superman” feature.  One of the earliest ones, seen below, was published in Action Comics # 333 (Feb., 1966).


Recently, in one of Brian Cronin’s columns, over at the Comics Should Be Good site, he posted the original art for that “Many Faces of Superman” piece from Action Comics # 333, along with a similar design sheet that I recognised as coming from one of the 100-Page Super-Spectaculars---Superman # 245 (Dec., 1971-Jan., 1972), to be precise.

That’s when I noticed something.  Something that I had missed noticing for decades.


Curt Swan’s Superman had not remained unchanged all those years.  He had made one significant alteration in his rendition of DC’s most famous star.


Did you catch it?  Probably.  It’s a lot easier to spot when the model sheets are so close together.  But I’ll bet you never noticed the difference when you were reading the issues of Superman or Action Comics drawn by Swan.  In the 1960’s-vintage sheet, Superman’s hair is parted on his right, with the famous “S” forecurl falling to the left.  But in the later version, from late 1971, the Man of Steel’s hair is parted on his left, and the forecurl falls to his right.


And, in case you’re thinking that, perhaps, one of the two model sheets was an aberration, well, no---I checked.  Looking though my stacks of Superman and Action Comics from the late ‘50’s, where Swan primarily did the covers, and the ‘60’s, after he started doing the interiors, in every case---regardless of inker---Superman’s hair was parted on the right, forecurl falling to the left.


Then I examined my boxes of Superman and Action Comics from the ‘70’s and early ‘80’s, and here the opposite version---hair parted on left, forecurl to right---was consistent.



So then it became a matter of determining when the change occurred.  My initial assumption was that it took place in conjunction with some significant development, such as Julius Schwartz’s early attempt to revitalise the Man of Steel, after he replaced Weisinger as editor.  Something like this would make sense.


But as it turned out, I was dead wrong. 


It took some time, sifting through a few dozen issues of Superman and Action Comics.  I even had to plug a gap of one missing issue, which I was able to do at the Heroes Convention.  But I finally pinpointed when Swan began reversing Superman’s hair.  And it was well before Schwartz took over or any efforts were made to give the Man of Steel and his alter ego a more contemporary look.

Which made the timing of the change-over perplexing.  Mort Weisinger was still in the editor's chair, and he was reluctant to tinker with DC's biggest seller.


The last appearance of Superman’s right-side part and the first appearance of his left-side part both took place in his own title.  The last time we see his hair parted on the right and his S-curl falling to the left in a story drawn by Swan comes in “The Case of the Collared Crime-Fighter”, from Superman # 208 (Jul., 1968). 


Swan parts the Metropolis Marvel’s hair on his left side for the first time in the next issue---“The Clark Kent Monster”, from Superman # 209 (Aug., 1968). 

The right-hand part makes a cameo appearance on the cover of Superman (Giant Annual) # 212 (Dec., 1968).  But other than that, Swan draws Superman with the left-hand part for the rest of his career.


Incidentally, Superman’s appearances in Action Comics conform to that divide.  It’s a right-side part in “The Case of the People Against Superman”, Action Comics # 359 (Feb., 1968).  Then, after a long stretch of issues in which other artists drew the Superman feature, Swan returns in “Mysteries of the Superman Awards”, Action Comics # 367 (Sep., 1968), and Our Hero is sporting a left-side part.



And that leaves us with the most unanswerable mystery of all:  why did Curt Swan change the part in Superman’s hair?

I can't even guess.


Views: 2068

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It should be obvious. There's a perfectly good reason why Superman's hair changed.

Red Kryptonite. A special type that doesn't last just for 48 hours. See? It's easy once you know the trick... ;)

Aw, man,  I miss Curt Swan's Superman!

I've never noticed the change in Superman's curl. I'd guess the change wasn't Swan's decision but the editors'. They were feeling the Marvel heat at that point and perhaps thought it would be a good idea to update his hairstyle. His later hairstyle is very much the same but livelier. I doubt they had to reverse the curl's direction to get that livelier look, but perhaps someone had suggested that the curl should go the other way so that it would subliminally suggest an 's' for 'Superman', and the editors adopted the suggestion as part of the makeover.

As for the Panther, you describe the original cowl as a "Batman-type half-cowl". Perhaps that's the key: given his cape, Lee may have thought he looked too much like Batman! Batman still had small ears at that point.

I had a thought about linking the change in Superman's hairstyle with the musical It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's Superman! either for bringing the change because that's how the actor looked or to distance Superman from the campy play. But the years were wrong. The musical began in 1966 and the change in 1968.

For what it's worth, the musical used the old hairstyle, more or less.

If I had to make a guess, it would be that by 1968, while the hippies were fading, their anti-war movement was spreading so perhaps giving Superman a more contemporary hairstyle (without it getting too long, of course! This ain't THOR!) was symbolic of the Man of Steel becoming more in tune with the changing attitudes that the high school and college students and many of their elders were embracing.

Here's the thing, Philip:  I suspect both you and Luke are conflating the change in Superman's hair-part/direction of his forecurl with the fuller, slightly longer hair he sports in the second model sheet, the one from late 1971.  When I first discovered the change and began to research when it took place, that was my initial assumption, too---that the direction of the forecurl changed after Julius Schwartz took over and he updated Superman for the times---slightly longer, thicker hair; more contemporary suits and eyeglasses for Clark Kent; and so forth.

But that had nothing to do with it.  Swan changed the side of the part/direction of the forecurl in 1968, when Superman was still wearing his conservative, 1960's hairstyle.  Mort Weisinger was still the editor, and nothing else had changed about Superman.

That's the mystery---and I should probably change the copy of my article to make it more clear:  there's no other apparent event to which to key the change in Superman's hair.  But Swan had to have had some reason for doing it.  But what?

Good pick-up, Commander.

I have every Superman and Action Comic between 1961 and 1986 (and more than quite a few before), but I had never noticed that before, or if I had, given it more than a passing thought!

I don't really have a clue about the reason for Superman's change in hairstyle, but I am wondering if assistant editor E. Nelson Bridwell was behind the change.

This may well have been about the time of Mort Weisinger's mental breakdown - or starting to lose interest in his job - and possibly Bridwell had a lot more influence or "pull," assuming that he was not de facto editor.

I am probably wrong, but it's the best I can come up with. I suppose it's possible Swan did it unilaterally, although I have my doubts on that count, unless Mort agreed with it afterwards (or by that stage, didn't care one way or the other!).

Sadly, Weisinger, Bridwell, and Swan are all long gone, so we'll probably never know for certain. And I doubt that young tyros of the time, like Cary Bates and Jim Shooter, would have been privy to that sort of decision-making.

In his native Wakanda, T'Challa wasn't trying to hide a secret identity with his mask. He's trying to look like a panther. The half-mask makes him look less like a real panther and more like a garden variety superhero, so to me this is one reason why the first-published full mask is a better look. However....

Over the rest of 1966 and into the next year, the Black Panther participated in four more issues of Fantastic Four, including 1967’s King-Size Special. But Stan Lee had plans to promote the Panther from supporting character to regular star. First, though, the groundwork had to be laid---by teaming the Prince of the Wakandas with Captain America in a four-part epic that began in Tales of Suspense # 97 (Jan., 1968) and ended in Captain America (ToS, after a title-change) # 100 (Apr., 1968). This made it logical for Cap---whom Roy Thomas was moving out of the Avengers—to recommend the Panther as his replacement, in The Avengers # 51.

Marvel mavens must have been puzzled by the appearance of the Black Panther on the cover of issue #52. Or, rather, by the change in his ceremonial costume. Instead of a full-faced cowl, the Panther wore the half-mask type that had been a fashion statement for super-heroes since the Batman swung across the cover of Detective Comics # 27.

I think we have a clue here. T-Challa didn't appear on the covers of TOS #97 or 99, which were Iron Man covers. On TOS #98 and Captain America #100 he appears in the full mask. The clue is that TOS #99 was the last time that book was split. This is when Independent News' stranglehold on Marvel started to loosen allowing them to rapidly expand. I firmly believe that the reason for fully covering his face in earlier issues was fear that bundles of stripped covers would be returned to Marvel after never having been displayed for sale. Marvel finally had more power when Avengers #52 went on sale. They also had more money at that point so that they could absorb such a loss, if it happened, and may have suggested to the distributor that they would raise a major scandal in the news media to get the public on board.

The Superman titles ran "There's a new Superman coming!" ads around 1968, so the editors were concerned about updating him around then. The curl change was probably part of that update.

It's not remembered as a period of change because of the bigger changes of the early 70s, but Ross Andru drew some stories, Superman Family elements like the Superman Emergency Squad were dropped, and the titles started doing multi-part stories. Swan also changed his style and new inkers were bought in around that point, but that may not be connected. (George Klein went to Marvel.)

Superman's hair does look a bit wilder on some of the late 60s covers. The model sheet does look like it comes from the 70s, though.

You're right about 1968 being a period of change, Luke.  In fact, it's why I demark that year as the end of the Silver Age.

Gardner Fox, Arnold Drake, Bill Finger, and Otto Binder stopped getting work because they had the temerity to ask DC for health insurance.  Carmine Infantino had been promoted to editorial director and had started shifting artists from their long-time series to new venues.  By the end of '68, almost no DC comic looked like it had the year before.

Over at the Superman family of magazines, as you pointed out, George Klein moved on to Marvel (and would die the year after that).  For about a year, Jack Abel took over inking Curt Swan's pencils on Superman and Action Comics.  Then in the fall of '69, George Roussos replaced Abel.  Neither Abel, nor Roussos, brought out the best in Swan's pencils.

And, of course, that's when Curt Swan was drawing Superman, at all.  For awhile, in 1966-8, it seemed like Al Plastino was doing every other issue of Superman, and Andru and Esposito handled the art chores on a five-issue run of Action Comics in '68.

And newcomer Neal Adams had replaced the familiar Swan and Klein on the covers of Superman and Action Comics.

I don't know if DC was concerned about updating Superman, specifically, or if it was concerned about updating its entire line, in its efforts to push back against Marvel Comics.  But the company was certainly flailing around, looking for something that would work.

One thing you said in your earlier response---". . . but perhaps someone had suggested that the curl should go the other way so that it would subliminally suggest an 's' for 'Superman' . . . ."---makes a wonky sort of sense.  The readers probably didn't attach any importance to the direction of Superman's forecurl.  Heck, I didn't even notice when Swan changed it. But I can see some suit from the board room tapping Weisinger on the shoulder and saying, "Hey, let's make the curl go in the other direction, so it looks like an 'S'---for 'Superman'."

Here's the ad I referred to. But is it really from 1968? I can't confirm that, and it has an 80s look. I shouldn't have said it ran in the Superman titles: I don't know where it appeared.

Luke Blanchard said:

Here's the ad I referred to. (But is it really from 1968? I can't confirm that, and it has an 80s look.) I shouldn't have said it ran in the  Superman titles: I don't know where it appeared.

Yes, it really is from 1968.  When you first mentioned it, I remembered the promo, but thought that it appeared in 1969, not '68.  So I dug through my stacks until I found it.  You were right.  It was, indeed, a 1968 advertisement.  The issue I found it in was Action Comics (Giant Annual) # 360 (Mar.-Apr., 1968).

I'm sure it appeared in other mags around the same time, but I stopped looking once I found it in Action Comics # 360.

Reply to Discussion



Latest Activity

Philip Portelli replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"How about Wilhelmina "Mina" Murray-Harker from the League of Extraordinary…"
4 minutes ago
Steve W replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Well I guess it's important if you had a copy of The Times of London number 1. The Times…"
7 minutes ago
Philip Portelli replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Spider-Woman's last issue had a photo cover!"
10 minutes ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Is the issue number important for any kinds of publications that aren't comics? Other than…"
39 minutes ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
""The Atom #1 was cover-dated July 1962, though there was no number 1 on the cover." See…"
54 minutes ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion She-Hulk
"ISSUE #5: This issue confirms what I suspected all along: I haven't read this series since it…"
1 hour ago
Peter Wrexham replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Something similar from DC.  The Atom #1 was cover-dated July 1962, though there was no number…"
1 hour ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Alan M.'s discussion So, What Are You Reading These Days? (besides comics)
"STARDUST: A couple of weeks ago, my niece contacted me about the Sandman TV show and comic book. I…"
1 hour ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"I do appreciate your effort, sir.   Actually, I think I may have gone out with Yelling…"
4 hours ago
Eric L. Sofer replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"I hope my choices helped, my friend. Yeah, a lot of the normalman characters were pretty much one…"
4 hours ago
Dave Palmer replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"When Dell and Western (Gold Key) split Dell started a whole bunch of titles to replace the titles…"
4 hours ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"Also added the Alley Cat and Twilight."
5 hours ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service