Halloween series and censored slashers , as much as I can take .

I saw the first two HALLOWEEN (Michael Mysers) on AMC , edited for TV .

  I'd never seen them before , actual-like . I saw them in reverse order , the showing of II follwed by the " " more for the West Coast "?? repeat of I .

  I have been in a hospital ~ again ~ the past couplish days , I am typing this standing up , in just hospital gowns and upper foot coverings (I have bi-i-iig diabetically ~ Type 2 ~ made worse " great toe " infections , on both feet .) .

  Some movie observations:

Views: 162

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

In I , for Jamie Lee Curtis and her female buddies , the usual " overaged Hollywood teenager " feel is made considerably more so by the fact that supposed normal teenagers are wearing what sure don't quite seem like what one would think as " late 70s groovy teenager " clothes .

Instead , their clothes (I guess hairstyles , too .) look considerably " older woman "-ish , one could even say " matron/yenta-ish " , well , sorta !!! Really , they seem to be rather " mature "-looking clothes for teenage babysitters coming home from HS .

  I suppose they're pretty well-off , upper middle-class teenagers in a " nice " neighborhood in a small town in the presumably more conservative Midwest - but still...

  Jamie and one of her buds share , in a car , what I suppose is supposed to be a joint , while driving !!!!!!!!! - However , the presumed doob has filter-on-a-tobacco-cigarette style shading on it .

  This is , perhaps , the first " slasher " film ~ and as such , the concept hadn't yet developed into a rigid pose/corset , besides the pace being FAARR more 70s-leisurely - The commercials on AMC included this slasher-movie spoofing ad for...insurance??...with sterotype slasherteens running as " When you're in a horror movie , you make stupid decisions . That's what you do " !!

  II brings out the Big Reveal about the blood (Um , sorry .) between two crucial characters...Okay , SPOILER , the rev that Curis's Laurie Strode and Michael Mysers are biological siblings ! May I bring up STAR WARS here :-) ? The late 70s , I tell ya...

  Jamie's daddy is a respectable real estate agent ,true , but could he really , even when adoptive kids' biologicals who weren't even in such a horror were routinely kept secret , give her a new identity in the same town ? Maybe he adopted her elsewhere and eventually moved there .

  Oh , and could the Myers house ,even at the edge of a um-c neighborhood , really be kept empty and rotting for 15 years ? Maybe the town planning board would want it knocked down , and then the lot maybe left non-built upon for a few ~ less than 15 ~ years ? (We will presume that Pa Strode inherited some receivership-regency for the house as the adoptive father of the only " good " survivor ,and has kept it for years , but even so ?????)

...The 1981-copyrighted II follows up directly after the original , set in 1978 - So were they already thinking clothes/styles were a bit of a " period piece " by then ? Sheessh , I got some meloncohly(Sp!!) at seeing " the way things used to look - whatsomeone young would react to all those curly-corded heavy plastic Ma Bell phones in use , I don't know...

Instead , their clothes (I guess hairstyles , too .) look considerably " older woman "-ish , one could even say " matron/yenta-ish " , well , sorta !!! Really , they seem to be rather " mature "-looking clothes for teenage babysitters coming home from HS .

Sounds like they were drawn by Steve Ditko.

I have the first movie (have seen more of them, but the first is best) but haven't watched it in a while.

Ditto Nightmare on Elm Street.

...Maybe I could compare it to the sort of " grown-up ' younger ' person , been through the Sixties " clothes that I recall , say , the actresses in the original Saturday Night Live cast wearing on the show . The somewhat puffed-out hair ~ Not quite " big hair " as we calll it to-day , although Jamie's came close ~ perhaps drew up a Jewish comparison , thus the " yenta " usage . " Younger " versions of " older woman " clothes , sort of .

  Really , were they supposed to have been at a Student Government Club meeting , or A-V Club , the theater group , to have been wearing such - relatively - " dressed-up " clothes to HS ?

  I've re-titled this , AMC is showing two a day of the Halloween series plus more this week ~ including SCREAM , which I am familiar with ~ So , I'll contribute ,in my own little way , to all the " marathon look back " posts here lately .

 



Richard Willis said:

Instead , their clothes (I guess hairstyles , too .) look considerably " older woman "-ish , one could even say " matron/yenta-ish " , well , sorta !!! Really , they seem to be rather " mature "-looking clothes for teenage babysitters coming home from HS .

Sounds like they were drawn by Steve Ditko.

I have the first movie (have seen more of them, but the first is best) but haven't watched it in a while.

Ditto Nightmare on Elm Street.

  I saw this in the theatre when it came out and I never noticed any of these things.  I remember being most impressed by the nudity and the blood, something very knew to me because I'd only just reached the age where I could go into that sort of movie.

...Well , the clothes , etc. were ,basically anyhow , contemporary then...And , heh heh , you said it yourself , about your age then:-)...

Mark S. Ogilvie said:

  I saw this in the theatre when it came out and I never noticed any of these things.  I remember being most impressed by the nudity and the blood, something very knew to me because I'd only just reached the age where I could go into that sort of movie.

...I got discharged earlier than anticipated but I also saw TREMORS , finally (Not always paying enough attention .) , which , of course , was an attemmpt at the " 50s monster flick " updated .

  Fun !!!!!!!!! (Played for so .)

  An odd point ~ It had what I assume were (heavily , anyway) " real " special effects , of real-matter , story-sized by the actors giant worms ~ Quite nifty/" euchhy "-looking .

...Since it was my thread:-).........I decided to restart this HALLOWEEN thread in honor of the LATEST Halloween  reboot, where Jamie Lee Curtis returns as Laurie Strode AGAIN.........No spoilers, 'que?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Welcome!

No flame wars. No trolls. But a lot of really smart people.The Captain Comics Round Table tries to be the friendliest and most accurate comics website on the Internet.

SOME ESSENTIALS:

RULES OF THE ROUND TABLE

MODERATORS

SMILIES FOLDER

TIPS ON USING THE BOARD

FOLLOW US:

OUR COLUMNISTS:

Groups

© 2019   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service