For me so far:

Amazing Spider-Man: No.  There's some interesting ideas in here, but not enough to spare some of my limited budgets of comics money/reading time.

Guardians of the Galaxy:  Yes. Just interesting enough to give them a chance.    
                                   
The New Avengers: Yes. So far, they seem to be treating Squirrel Girl well.        
                                   
Spider-Gwen: Yes. So far, they've maintained the quality from the previous book.      
                             
The Uncanny Avengers:  Maybe. It's mildly interesting, but I really don't like Deadpool.      
                   
How about you?

Views: 2045

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

And we're about to see it all again on Netflix!

Picked up A-Force #1 today.

Read the A-Force book.  It was alright, but not compelling. Currently leaning towards not following on with it.

Did it explain why the team was all chicks?

The "in story" reason is that they were folded into the new Marvel U from a Paradise Island type portion of Battleworld. The big picture reason is that the book is just part of Marvel's agenda to put out more female-friendly comics.

Maybe they should be thinking twice before making female unfriendly comics then.

Thanks, 'Tec.

As I've said before, I have no problem with an all-female Avengers, and I hope to God it attracts some female readers. Lay on, MacDuff, as they say. My only question was whether there was an in-story reason that made it plausible, and not obvious and painful!

Detective 445 said:

The "in story" reason is that they were folded into the new Marvel U from a Paradise Island type portion of Battleworld. The big picture reason is that the book is just part of Marvel's agenda to put out more female-friendly comics.

Please stop saying spiteful, angry remarks like this.

Ron M. said:

Maybe they should be thinking twice before making female unfriendly comics then.Pl

Who's being spiteful or angry? If they think they need more female friendly comics then they must think what they've been doing before wasn't female friendly. Otherwise there'd be no need to make changes.

The New Mutants was almost all female for years, to the point they were complaining there weren't enough boys on the team. While it would be unrealistic, perhaps the best way would be to have one female character attempt to contact Avengers for assistance and only other females were available at that moment. After working together a bit they'd decide to stay together.

Of course, that would be unrealistic as well.

In most situations where there is an actual choice, some genre mixing is both expected and welcome.

A team that is _mostly_ composed of females could be an interesting line-up, though.  Particularly if the characters themselves begin to comment on that.  A skilled writer could make that work and it would be refreshing.

There's really no realistic way to explain why your team is all female except to just say you didn't want any men on the team. There aren't enough female heroes (let alone female Avengers) for it to be believable that they just happened by accident to be all women.

There are a few characters that it would make sense to seek out, but not enough to form a full team. If you wanted power you'd try to get Thor, and Thor is currently female. If you wanted a great tactician you'd want Steve Rogers or the Black Widow, and last I heard Rogers is still old. If you needed someone that could change size for some reason, you might pick Jan instead of Hank or Scott Lang. Beyond that you'd be back to picking women because they were women.

I really think the Avengers should have kept the idea they started before Onslaught changed everything. They were putting heroes on call that had certain skills. If they needed to operate underwater and Namor was unavailable they'd call Stingray for instance. A different team in every storyline would make it possible to have an all female team assemble at some point.

One thing I wouldn't want to see is the old "all the men in the world are dying/disappearing/turning into monsters, and the women have to work together and figure out why."

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Richard Willis replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
28 minutes ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion Ray Palmer and Jean Loring's Wedding
"Cool. Thanks, gents."
44 minutes ago
Commander Benson replied to The Baron's discussion Ray Palmer and Jean Loring's Wedding
"Oops! Philip beat me to it."
55 minutes ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Rob Staeger (Grodd Mod)'s discussion Your Favorite Things of the Year! (Est. 2017)
"Last volume! This is late, but I'll bet they delayed it to coincide with Charles Schulz'…"
56 minutes ago
Commander Benson replied to The Baron's discussion Ray Palmer and Jean Loring's Wedding
"The Grand Comics Database entry on this issue indicates that the fellow between and behind Aquaman…"
57 minutes ago
Steve W replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Today's offering is all about paying attention..."
1 hour ago
Philip Portelli replied to The Baron's discussion Ray Palmer and Jean Loring's Wedding
"That's Adam (Captain Comet) Blake who helped the Atom in his search for Jean in Super…"
1 hour ago
Lee Houston, Junior replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"GCD says Little Archie #95 was cover dated May 1975, The concept started out in the Archie Giant…"
1 hour ago
Steve W replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"According to GCD, Little Archie #95 was published in May 1975 - one month before I left school.…"
1 hour ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Dark Shadows
""Selby's character is named Quentin, although he doesn't seem to be the same guy as…"
1 hour ago
The Baron replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"When was this published?  I know that back at St. Anne's, the nuns got away with stuff…"
1 hour ago
Irma Kruhl replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
1 hour ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service