anyone know any examples of no-prizes? heard about em over the years but never actually read one.

Views: 488

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's just an empty envelope with drawings of Marvel heroes on it. At least that's all mine was. Sadly tore up the envelope it came in pretty badly to get to that empty envelope. Wanted to keep both of them.The no-prize is supposed to be inside. It's empty because there's no prize. That's the joke. No prize. No-prize.

What did you get it for, Ron?

It was during the brief time Marvel Age was giving them out. I correctly identified that Marvel's hit X-Men had been stomped on in sales by the one shot The Life and Times of Pope John Paul II. I forget the miniseries that claimed the #2 spot but X-Men, long #1, was shoved down to #3 that month. Marvel must have been shocked that a comic book about the pope sold so well.

I've never seen one but Ron's description fits with what I've heard. Pretty sure they were the same when Flo Steinberg used to send them out.

My "No-Prize" winning letter appeared in Defenders #131, but that was also after Marvel stopped sending out those empty envelopes. You can see a picture of one in Les Danials' Marvel history. Incidentally, I also named a LOC column: Marvel Age... #14, I think it was. (John Byrne homage to FF #1 cover.)

I was owed a no-prize in the early 80s over an error I discovered in an issue of Marvel Age.  I don't remember the exact error as this was over 30 years ago, but it had something to do with a reference to an X-Men Annual but the article referenced the wrong issue number.  I, and I'm sure hundreds of others, pointed this out via a postcard or letter, as the editor referred to the incident a few issues later, stating that so many had written in that the budget didn't allow for the mailing of so many no-prizes and to consider those of us who wrote in "officially no-prized."  OK, fine, but it still would have been cool to get that envelope!

As you point out it's been over thirty years so I may be remembering wrong, but I think the no-prizes were leftovers from Stan's days as editor and they were mailing them out until they were all gone.

I recall a "Stan's Soapbox" or the equivalent -- maybe it was Mark Gruenwald's "Mark's Remarks" or something like that -- that at the time declared the bar for getting a No-Prize was going to be set a little higher. It wouldn't be enough to just point out a mistake; the letter writer had to also provide a face-saving explanation for why it wasn't a mistake. Don't know how long that policy lasted.

In the tradition of "Bob Banner" not being a mistake because his name was Robert Bruce Banner.

ClarkKent_DC said:

I recall a "Stan's Soapbox" or the equivalent -- maybe it was Mark Gruenwald's "Mark's Remarks" or something like that -- that at the time declared the bar for getting a No-Prize was going to be set a little higher. It wouldn't be enough to just point out a mistake; the letter writer had to also provide a face-saving explanation for why it wasn't a mistake. Don't know how long that policy lasted.

I'm pretty sure that was Stan who made the change. Possibly Goodman was complaining he was giving too many away.

yeah i remember it saying you had to give a reason for the mistake, i just don't remember any

Ron M. said:

I'm pretty sure that was Stan who made the change. Possibly Goodman was complaining he was giving too many away.


No, this would have been well after Stan and Martin Goodman were both out of the picture, in the '80s or the '90s.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Richard Willis replied to ClarkKent_DC's discussion The Marist College Mindset List for 2026
"Although older Americans may think of Hillary Clinton as primarily First Lady from the 1990s,…"
30 minutes ago
Richard Willis replied to ClarkKent_DC's discussion The New Season (2022)
"I've watched the first two episodes of Quantum Leap, and really like it. The character…"
1 hour ago
Luke Blanchard replied to Randy Jackson's discussion Fastball Special
"Golden Age heroes with sidekicks sometimes used athletic team-work. The question is what qualifies…"
3 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to ClarkKent_DC's discussion The Marist College Mindset List for 2026
""They have found a way to make this year's list even more boring than ones from previous…"
4 hours ago
Randy Jackson posted a discussion

Fastball Special

I don't suppose anyone has a list of pitchers and balls for the fastball special? By pitchers I…See More
4 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC posted a discussion

The Marist College Mindset List for 2026

Once again, friends, it's time for the latest guidance from Marist College, which has inherited the…See More
6 hours ago
PowerBook Pete, the Mad Mod replied to Emerkeith Davyjack's discussion All-purpose newspaper strips discussion
"Following are the Mutts comic strips from a couple of weeks ago."
8 hours ago
PowerBook Pete, the Mad Mod replied to Emerkeith Davyjack's discussion All-purpose newspaper strips discussion
"Maybe the word "comics" is a problem, and there are those who consistently refer to them…"
8 hours ago
PowerBook Pete, the Mad Mod replied to Emerkeith Davyjack's discussion All-purpose newspaper strips discussion
"So many still think all comics or animations are for kids after decades of proof otherwise."
8 hours ago
Steve W replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
9 hours ago
Richard Willis replied to Emerkeith Davyjack's discussion All-purpose newspaper strips discussion
"Jeff of Earth-J said: One of the themed "letters to the editor" columns appeared under…"
9 hours ago
Rob Staeger (Grodd Mod) replied to Rob Staeger (Grodd Mod)'s discussion DC's Digital Backlist
"The list of October releases came out, and it's basically all Wildstorm aside from SSoSV.…"
9 hours ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service