Thought it would be fun to re-watch these, since I finally picked up a copy of Star Trek - Into Darkness from the cheapie bin, which means I now have copies of all of them.
So, on into space, the filmic frontier...
Tags:
Star Trek (2009)
Written by Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman
Overall: In my opinion, this was a good but not great picture. It was well-cast and well-shot, with some great flashy effects. But to my mind, Nero wasn't that great of a villain, and in the final analysis, the film suffered from having more style than substance.
The Baron said:
I also thought that the Uhura/Spock relationship was a nice twist, too.
To me it recalled the two(?) early episodes of the original series which had Uhura flirting with Spock. Also, Zoe Saldana and Zachary Quinto are two current actors that I enjoy immensely. The entire crew was well-cast, and how often can you say that? I think this first reboot suffered a little bit from the "origin story" disease. The destruction of Vulcan was very surprising and untethered them from all of the continuity, which was probably a smart move. They can reintroduce it as they see fit.
This also led to an Audi Commercial in which Nimoy reintroduced his infamous Ballad of Bilbo Baggins. "Go Bilbo!"
"I'll see you inside!"
Spock's gotten devious in his old age. One might almost say...human.
I liked it but for giving Kirk command. It just didn't make sense that a guy who barely seemed to make it through the academy would get a front line ship.
Mark S. Ogilvie said:
I liked it but for giving Kirk command. It just didn't make sense that a guy who barely seemed to make it through the academy would get a front line ship.
Agreed. And since Chekov was the only guy on the ship with even less seniority, I would think Kirk would find himself butting heads with, well, everybody (except Chekov).
I notice that one of the guys that beat up Kirk early in the picture was on the Enterprise later on. I bet that guy asked for a transfer real quick.
I think the main difference between this Kirk and the one I knew was responsibility of command. I know he was old but the Kirk in the series seemed to me like a real commander, not just a military one but one who understood and cherished the core values of Starfleet (at least most of the time, not all scripts are equal). This new Kirk didn't seem to have that.
Old?
Never read any of the Bond novels so I don't know if the new guy is playing him according to the books, but he's definitely not like the earlier guys. Didn't even know his drinks should be shaken not stirred. I get he's supposed to not be the classic Bond yet (and this new Kirk isn't supposed to be the guy Shatner played yet) but I don't see them becoming the characters they're supposed to be playing. Just like Cyclops from the past doesn't seem much like Stan and Jack's Scott, or even Roy and Neal's. Just the current writer's Scott acting like he's from the past.
It can be done. Will Murray has done an excellent job of giving us as close as possible to Lester Dent's Doc Savage without calling Dent up from his rest.