You know the drill.

Views: 11135

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

On the other hand, I've found the second week of the Olympics this year to be more exciting than the first. Mostly because the prime-time coverage during the first week is front-loaded with swimming and gymnastics, and the second week has more track and field stuff, which I like better. I don't like as much the sports that rely on subjective scoring like diving and synchronized swimming. Give me track; either you get across the finish line first or you don't. Either you jump farther or leap higher or toss the shot or the hammer farther or you don't, and nobody can argue with that.

And this year, in the track and field events, I've seen a LOT of races where there were upsets, where there were new faces or countries that won their first medals in decades or for the first time ever, which is exciting. 

Also, one star I was happy to see return was Allyson Felix, the queen of the track, who overcame a difficult, dangerous pregnancy -- and Nike trying to cut her endorsement compensation by 70 percent BECAUSE she was pregnant -- and her daughter spending a month in the pediatric ICU after she was born by Caesarean section. Allyson Felix is wonderful. 

"..they're still calling it 'Tokyo 2020.'"

On Wait, Wait... Don't Tell Me today, Peter Sagel quipped they're still calling it the 2020 Olympics because of our fond memories of last year.

"Anybody yammering that Simone Biles is a quitter can go piss up a rope."

I think it was John Oliver who referred to those people as criticizing her because "she wouldn't do flips for their amusement." (Until last week, I had never ever heard of "the twisties" but, having learned more about the phenomenon, I realize how horrible it must be.) Biles should get a medal for having the courage to stand up for her own best interest. 

Jeff of Earth-J said:

"Anybody yammering that Simone Biles is a quitter can go piss up a rope."

I think it was John Oliver who referred to those people as criticizing her because "she wouldn't do flips for their amusement." (Until last week, I had never ever heard of "the twisties" but, having learned more about the phenomenon, I realize how horrible it must be.) Biles should get a medal for having the courage to stand up for her own best interest. 

Amen. You go, girl!

The same people who criticized her would be looking for someone to blame if she hadn't pulled out and a tragedy occurred

Clark said:

On the other hand, I've found the second week of the Olympics this year to be more exciting than the first. Mostly because the prime-time coverage during the first week is front-loaded with swimming and gymnastics, and the second week has more track and field stuff, which I like better. I don't like as much the sports that rely on subjective scoring like diving and synchronized swimming. Give me track; either you get across the finish line first or you don't. Either you jump farther or leap higher or toss the shot or the hammer farther or you don't, and nobody can argue with that.

And this year, in the track and field events, I've seen a LOT of races where there were upsets, where there were new faces or countries that won their first medals in decades or for the first time ever, which is exciting.

I'm right there with you on this part of the Olympics. I told a buddy last week, "I want to see who runs the fastest, who throws crap the farthest, and who jumps the highest or longest."

My main issue with the games this year is that I heard a lot of the results in the morning, and then they would show even that night. Kind of ruined it.

Travis Herrick (Modular Mod) said:

My main issue with the games this year is that I heard a lot of the results in the morning, and then they would show even that night. Kind of ruined it.

That's always a problem with the Olympics and the time difference between wherever they're being held and the U.S. NBC tries to schedule what it can for prime time, but most of the time that would mean the athletes competing in the middle of the night or the wee hours of the morning, which isn't feasible. Like Simone Biles competing on the balance beam. Anyone could see it live if they got up at 4 a.m.

(I love Simone Biles dearly, I love her as much as the next guy, but I did not get up at 4 a.m.)

Three or four Olympics games ago, NBC took the approach that it would air events as if they were live, and not even acknowledge they happened earlier. It's silly, but what's the alternative? It's not like other news outlets are going to withhold the results until NBC puts those events on -- 

... which NBC learned after trying to get them to agree to do just that. 

Clark said:

Three or four Olympics games ago, NBC took the approach that it would air events as if they were live, and not even acknowledge they happened earlier. It's silly, but what's the alternative? It's not like other news outlets are going to withhold the results until NBC puts those events on --

I don't know a good alternative. I know the men's basketball bronze medal game was played at 10PM Tokyo time, just so it could be shown live here as 8AM CST. That is an awfully late start time for basketball game, which means it ended around Midnight.

I think it was the London games where I was getting up real early on the weekends to watch different sports. I remember I watched a lot of rowing, which I somehow managed to miss entirely this time.

Another thing I love about the Olympics is learning what countries are good at what sports. I always knew China was great at badminton, but Denmark is really good too.  Apparently, a lot of Olympians train in Denmark. This year's gold medalist of the men's single tournament is Danish and he beat the Rio gold medalist from China. I love learning/seeing stuff like that.  

Travis Herrick (Modular Mod) said:

I think it was the London games where I was getting up real early on the weekends to watch different sports. I remember I watched a lot of rowing, which I somehow managed to miss entirely this time.

This year, I was flipping between NBC, USA, The Olympics Channel, The Golf Channel and the Olympics News Channel, so I saw more of the non-marquee sports, including a lot of rowing. I also saw weightlifting, men's and women's marathons, men's and women's race walking (which I understand is to be retired), and more of the track and field stuff like the hammer throw, men's and women's shot put, women's pole vaulting, men's long jump, and men's and women's steeplechase.

I also saw something new: mixed men's and women's 4x400 relay, which has two men and two women on each team. Also new were rock climbing and skateboarding, which, frankly, I don't think are justifiable as Olympic-level competitions. 

I also saw boxing, which I almost thought was retired. When I was a kid, the boxers were the stars of the Olympics -- Muhammad Ali, Sugar Ray Leonard, Michael Spinks and Leon Spinks. But now? They're practically anonymous. 

I just missed the mixed 4x100 relay, just the aftermath. I didn't catch any boxing, you're right Clark, you don't hear anything about it any more.

I usually watch a good amount of volleyball, as I come from a volleyball family. Both of my parents and my brother played in leagues for year.

I wish I had been able to see all of the decathlon and heptathlon, but I didn't. The guy who won the gold medal, would have also won the bronze medal in the long jump with his result in the decathlon. I thought that was awesome.

I've mentioned my doctor a few times and the great stories he has to tell (like this one or this one or this one). Well, if you've got an hour to spare, you can hear him in his own voice. He was the guest on the Tiger Gene podcast.

Hear how a man who was the youngest of 20 (!) children from humble beginnings in Kentucky became a Phi Beta Kappa scholar and one of the top doctors in Washington, D.C., but still faces ignorance from people who can't see past his skin and handles it all with grace and good humor -- and has plenty of good stories to tell.

"Episode 12: David Patterson, M.D."

I enjoyed the podcast and re-enjoyed the three postings.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

ClarkKent_DC replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Is the issue number important for any kinds of publications that aren't comics? Other than…"
16 minutes ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
""The Atom #1 was cover-dated July 1962, though there was no number 1 on the cover." See…"
31 minutes ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion She-Hulk
"ISSUE #5: This issue confirms what I suspected all along: I haven't read this series since it…"
40 minutes ago
Peter Wrexham replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Something similar from DC.  The Atom #1 was cover-dated July 1962, though there was no number…"
43 minutes ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Alan M.'s discussion So, What Are You Reading These Days? (besides comics)
"STARDUST: A couple of weeks ago, my niece contacted me about the Sandman TV show and comic book. I…"
1 hour ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"I do appreciate your effort, sir.   Actually, I think I may have gone out with Yelling…"
4 hours ago
Eric L. Sofer replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"I hope my choices helped, my friend. Yeah, a lot of the normalman characters were pretty much one…"
4 hours ago
Dave Palmer replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"When Dell and Western (Gold Key) split Dell started a whole bunch of titles to replace the titles…"
4 hours ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 870 Super-Heroines
"Also added the Alley Cat and Twilight."
4 hours ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 868 Super-Heroines
"Added Scorpio Eose, Whisper and Willow."
4 hours ago
The Baron replied to The Baron's discussion The List of 865 Super-Heroines
"OK."
4 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"More Marvel nonsense:"
5 hours ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service