MARVEL_SWORD_4_by_Deadlydelmundo Marvel Comics recently announced the cancellation of one of my favorite new titles: SWORD. I’m not angry about it. I saw the sales numbers and knew it wasn’t long for this world. But it’s still a little disappointing.


There are a number of reasons why SWORD didn’t garner a larger audience. For example, it didn’t have a high profile creative team. It didn’t spin out of a major crossover. And it’s not part of a hot property (the X-Men aren’t as strong right now as Green Lantern or the Avengers). Yet I think that one of the underestimated reasons for its failure is timing.


SWORD’s biggest star is Beast, former Avenger and X-Man. It paired him with Agent Abigail Brand, introduced by Joss Whedon in the pages of Astonishing X-Men. And it included a number of aliens as co-stars, including Lockheed the Dragon.


Over the past year or two, X-Men fans have watched as Beast became increasingly frustrated with his fellow X-Men. He went on his own personal journey to find a cure for the sudden decrease in the mutant population. He confronted Cyclops and Emma Frost concerning some of the choices they were making as leaders. He increasingly withdrew from active participation and threatened to leave on several occasions. It was pretty clear that Beast was going to quit. It wasn’t a matter of if, it was a matter of when.


10700storystory_full-1081984. And that brings us to the matter of timing. Beast finally quit the X-Men in issue #519, which reached stores on Dec. 23, 2009. Unfortunately, Beast’s debut in SWORD #1 arrived in comic book shops in November. Even the second issue of SWORD was out before Beast officially quit his other team.


That means that X-fans ignored SWORD as just another X-Men spin-off. But if the timing was different, SWORD could have been promoted as Beast’s new team title. It would be like Batman and the Outsiders or Hawkeye and the West Coast Avengers. It wouldn’t be a guarantee of success. But it would have increased the possibility of success.


Imagine this scenario: Beast finally quits the X-Men as he’s been threatening to do for nearly two years. He walks out at the end of issue #519. On the next page, the reader sees an ad for SWORD. “Follow Beast into his new title, SWORD, coming this March from Marvel Comics. Spinning out of the pages of Astonishing X-Men and Uncanny X-Men, Abigail Brand, Beast and the agents of SWORD defend Earth from alien threats and galactic danger.”


I think that more fans would have been inclined to pre-order issues of SWORD in that scenario. It still might not have succeeded. They may not have liked its quirky tone or its odd guest-stars. I found it intriguing but I understand that it might not have been for everyone. However, the audience would have at least been there to give SWORD a chance. It would have stood or fallen on its own feet, instead of being almost immediately destined for cancellation.


I knew that SWORD was already in sales trouble when I read Uncanny X-Men #519. That’s when I realized that SWORD had simply debuted too soon. It would have had a much better chance of surviving had it come out in March. It was a matter of timing. Marvel’s rush to publish SWORD may have doomed it to failure.

This isn’t the only example. Marvel has done a good job of debuting some other titles, such as giving Madrox and Pete Wisdom mini-series that served as introductions for X-Factor and Captain Britain and MI:13 (it was a good move, even though it didn’t work in the latter example). But in other cases, they’ve simply brought out books too quickly. That was one of the factors in the quick cancellation of Jeff Parker’s Exiles as well. It’s too bad. These were good books that I would have loved to keep reading. And with a little better timing, I might have been able to.

Views: 78

Comment by Chris Fluit on January 30, 2010 at 10:28am
As another example of bad timing: I wrote this article last weekend, or a couple of days before Marvel announced the line-up for their Heroic Age Avengers. So Beast is getting a new team after all.
Comment by Jeff of Earth-J on January 30, 2010 at 10:36am
I must admit that the only thing I knew about Sword prior to reading your article was the title. What was the term we coined on the old board? "Meta-continuity?" "Hyper-continuity?" Whatever it was, the kind of (Marvel) universal storytelling popular at Marvel these days is a real turn-off for me, to the point at which I follow only one ongoing Marvel title regularly. I flipping through Diamond's Previews catelogue yesterday and I was able to flip through the Marvel section very quickly indeed! But I didn't come here to complain about Marvel. (Really, I didn't!) My point is that it's kind of a shame I feel that way because it blinded me to Sword, which seems to have been exactly the kind of title I've been looking for.

What you say about the timing of Sword is interesting, because the Who Will Wield the Shield? one-shot and Captain America #602 were both released before the sixth issue of the Captain America Reborn limited series, which they follow.
Comment by ClarkKent_DC on January 30, 2010 at 7:52pm
Speaking of the limited series, wasn't that supposed to be a five issue series at the outset? If so, that explains the overlap, but whether that's the case or not, Who Will Wield the Shield? and Captain America #602 should have followed the finale of Captain America Reborn.
Comment by Alan M. on January 31, 2010 at 1:16pm
Chris said:
As another example of bad timing: I wrote this article last weekend, or a couple of days before Marvel announced the line-up for their Heroic Age Avengers. So Beast is getting a new team after all.

They did? I must've missed that... Who's on the lineup?
Comment by Chris Fluit on January 31, 2010 at 3:31pm
Comment by ClarkKent_DC:
Speaking of the limited series, wasn't that supposed to be a five issue series at the outset? If so, that explains the overlap, but whether that's the case or not, Who Will Wield the Shield? and Captain America #602 should have followed the finale of Captain America Reborn.

I agree with you, CK. Especially considering WWtS had "the exciting aftermath of Captain America: Reborn" on the cover.

Comment by Alan M.:
Who's on the lineup?

I don't know if it's the official line-up, but the Heroic Age Avengers picture includes Gorilla Man (from Agents of Atlas), Black Widow, the Thing, Beast, Hawkeye (Clint Barton), Captain America (Bucky Barnes), Thor, Iron Man and Spider-Man.
Comment by Alan M. on January 31, 2010 at 4:52pm
Ah. Thanks, Chris. That I've seen, I just read it as a general promotional image rather than an actual line-up. Guess we'll see...
Comment by ClarkKent_DC on February 1, 2010 at 9:57am
If I didn't know better, I'd just swear somebody told me there's a character named "Gorilla Man." But that couldn't possibly be true ...
Comment by Cavaliere (moderator emeritus) on February 1, 2010 at 10:04am
#4 of Reborn said "4 of 5" but #5 said "5 of 6."
Comment by PowerBook Pete, the Mad Mod on February 1, 2010 at 10:38am
Clark, Gorilla Man was a 50s character who appeared in one What If? in the 70s and was revived again a couple of years ago.
Comment by ClarkKent_DC on February 1, 2010 at 11:25am
Comment by PowerBook Pete:
Clark, Gorilla Man was a 50s character who appeared in one What If? in the 70s and was revived again a couple of years ago.

Wha -- ? I am gobsmacked.

Next thing you know, somebody will tell me there really was an "Arm-Fall-Off-Boy" ...

Comment

You need to be a member of Captain Comics to add comments!

Join Captain Comics

Welcome!

No flame wars. No trolls. But a lot of really smart people.The Captain Comics Round Table tries to be the friendliest and most accurate comics website on the Internet.

SOME ESSENTIALS:

RULES OF THE ROUND TABLE

MODERATORS

SMILIES FOLDER

TIPS ON USING THE BOARD

FOLLOW US:

OUR COLUMNISTS:

Groups

© 2019   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service