'Before Watchmen': No controversy about its quality

By Andrew A. Smith

Scripps Howard News Service


Here in the real world, the DC series of miniseries called “Before Watchmen” was controversial. But there’s no debate about the quality of the stories themselves: They’re really good.


First, the controversy. It begins with writer Alan Moore, who became a legend in the 1980s, not only due to Watchmen and a brilliant re-invention of Swamp Thing, but also for  a number of projects for smaller publishers that became famous (and often famously bad movies), like From Hell, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and V for Vendetta.


But Moore’s relationship with DC began to sour, beginning with Watchmen itself (summed up neatly at Slate). A clause in the contract DC signed with Moore and artist Dave Gibbons established that the rights to Watchmen would revert to the duo as soon as it went out of print. But DC collected the series as a trade paperback – which as “the best-selling graphic novel of all time,” according to DC, has never gone out of print. Moore feels he was swindled.


Moore famously refused to take any money for the 2009 “Watchmen” film, which he referred to in the L.A. Times as “regurgitated worms” and “inherently unfilmable." And when DC announced “Before Watchmen,” Moore reacted much the same, telling The New York Times the prequel series was “completely shameless.”


“I don’t want money,” he told The Times. “I want for this not to happen.” And he suggested that anyone who supported the Watchmen prequels “would be doing me an enormous favor if they would just stop buying my other books.  When I think of my audience, I like to have good thoughts and think about how lucky I am to have one that is as intelligent as mine and as moral as mine” (interview with Seraphemera Books & Music).


Pretty strong stuff. And, given how shabbily the comics industry has treated its talent over the decades, one can’t help but see Moore’s point. On the other hand, is it fair to ask fans to forgo the best parts of their hobby in protest of something they can’t affect?  Should we stop reading Superman for how badly DC treated creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, or avoid seeing the Avengers movie because Marvel was mean to Avengers co-creator Jack Kirby?


That decision specifically comes into play with “Before Watchmen,” which are too good to avoid reading unless your conscience just won’t let you. You can judge for yourself, as all the Watchmen prequels have been released in four hardbacks coming out this month ($29.99 each), collected by author.


If you’ve read Watchmen (and who hasn’t?), you know that it had a surprise breakout star in the uncompromising, Manichean, scary-crazy Rorschach, and a surprise villain (which I will not spoil, in the unlikely event that is possible). The honor of both those roles falls to one character in these four prequels, which interconnect as they cover ground from when the Minutemen characters began to debut (1939) and the events of Watchmen (1985). That character is The Comedian, the disgraced former Minuteman, who shows surprising depth and – well, just surprises, in his every appearance. (Which is often; he turns up at critical times in most of the books, with his machinations often having profound effects on the other characters.)


Before Watchmen: Comedian/Rorschach tells his story, which involves the Kennedys, Marilyn Monroe, the Bay of Pigs, Vietnam and more Baby Boomer history than you can swing a protest sign at,  by crime-noir writer Brian Azzarello and artist J.G. Jones. And it’s a corker. The Rorschach story, by Azarello and artist Lee Bermejo, is less memorable, but offers insight into one of the most damaged, and therefore interesting, characters ever created.


But I’m getting ahead of myself: The book I’d recommend first would be Before Watchmen: Minutemen/Silk Spectre. The Minutemen story is the spine that holds all the rest together, stringing together hints from throwaway lines in the original Watchmen, like “Hooded Justice went missing in ’55,” and building a coherent, satisfying history with them. Minutemen was written and drawn by Darwyn Cooke (New Frontier) whose retro sensibilities make him the perfect creator for this project. He writes the Silk Spectre story, too, which is drawn by the always amazing Amanda Conner and deconstructs the complicated relationship between Laurie “Silk Spectre II” Juspeczyk and her mother, Sally “Silk Spectre” Jupiter, during the psychedelic ‘60s.


Before Watchmen: Nite Owl/Dr. Manhattan collects the entries by writer J. Michael Straczynski (Babylon 5), including the two-issue Before Watchmen: Moloch. The Nite Owl story expands on the history of the titular character’s 1970s partnership with Rorschach, as well as underscoring the erotic charge playing superhero gave to Dan Dreiberg, in conjunction with a new character, The Twilight Lady, an unnervingly confident dominatrix. The Dr. Manhattan story is gorgeously drawn by Adam Hughes, and is an interesting look at superheroics through the lens of quantum physics, while also answering the question “Why didn’t the virtually omniscient Dr. Manhattan know about the villain’s master plan in Watchmen and stop it?” The Moloch story, drawn by 100 Bullets artist Eduardo Risso, is a short, sad and very convincing tale of what might create a “supervillain.”


The least of the four is Before Watchmen: Ozymandis/Crimson Corsair, which collects the contributions by writer Len Wein, the original editor on Watchmen. It’s good – I’m a long-time fan of Wein’s – but just not as good as the others. The Ozymandias story is drawn by Jae Lee, whose weird, slick art seems like a throwback to an age that never existed, and is always a treat. But the story offers very little insight into the lead character than what we already knew. Crimson Corsair collects a story that originally appeared as two-page back-ups in all the “Before Watchmen” books, which necessarily makes it a really choppy read, compounded by the switch in writers midway from Wein to artist (and original Watchmen colorist) John Higgins. While reminiscent of the eerie Tales of the Black Freighter in Watchmen, that story echoed and underscored themes in its parent book, whereas Crimson Corsair is just a pirate horror story with no larger literary ambition. This book also includes the Dollar Bill one-shot, and while I enjoyed the wonderful, retro art by Steve Rude, it’s a one-note story about a one-dimensional character only notable for his slapstick death.


Is all that enough to overcome one’s urge to support Moore in his battle with DC? That’s up to the individual. But DC has made it hard by unleashing A-list talent on some of the most interesting characters ever created, and which we will likely not see again.


Contact Captain Comics at capncomics@aol.com.

Views: 682

Comment by Travis Herrick (Modular Mod) on July 26, 2013 at 6:00pm

I'm not trying to be political, but to tell you the truth, I think the youth movement of my youth has endured 30-40 years of demonization by the right wing, which the media has adopted as a given, to the point where left-wing protests of today are utterly ignored, like the anti-Iraq war protests, or derided, like the Occupy movement -- even though they're usually much larger than things like Tea Party protests, which led the news everywhere. So I genuinely miss those days, when the prevailing political consensus was one of open-minded, progressive optimism. We thought we were changing the world, and for all of one generation, we did.

I guess it depends on which side of the aisle you are on, because for me outside of Fox, all of the major networks are left-leaning. Going way off topic here, but here I go anyways. In little old Republican-heavy Texas the Occupy movement got quite a bit of news coverage. From what I read the problem with that movement was that they were against the 1%, and that was about it. They needed better organization, plus some were incensed that all of these people could afford to take months off from work in order to protest.

I hate political discussions yet here I am again...

I do agree on the Rorschach series though, it was missed opportunity. Merely good, not great.

Which is what I thought about the Ozymandis series as well, good. He didn't have much of a personality in the original series, nor much of one here. Brainiac 5 shows more of a personality and emotion than Ozy does.

Comment by Captain Comics on July 26, 2013 at 6:50pm

Yeah, the Ozymandias story felt like a checklist of things we learned about him in Watchmen. We know he did A, so here is A. We know he did B, so here is B. We know he did C ... and so on. I did like the Jae Lee art, though. It's weird, but also weirdly familiar, in a dreamlike way.

Comment by Jason Marconnet (Pint sized mod) on July 27, 2013 at 4:01pm

I read all of these when they came out monthly. Minutemen and Silk Spectre were the best of the bunch. I was surprised by Silk Spectre because she was my least favorite from the original. However that series got better with each issue.


On the whole this effort was a good effort and a successful one at that. While I didn't enjoy each series on the same level they were all quality showings.  DC really put thought into the making of each series.  The quality shows in each title.

Comment by Border Mutt on July 29, 2013 at 4:21pm

From the perspective of someone who wasn't around in the 60's or early 70's, I thought Silk Spectre did a really good job telling an interesting story that really made good use of its era; making it intrinsic to its story without overwhelming it.  On the other hand, the Comedian story seemed to be so tied into its setting, with constant references to people and locations, that I found it off putting in a way that people with clear memories of the era may not.

Comment by Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man on August 2, 2013 at 5:47pm

They really fleshed out Silk Spectre as a character, didn't they? I also liked what they did with Silhouette in the Minutemen series.

And as much as I realize this will infuriate Figs (sorry, bro!), I loved Comedian (such a reprehensible person) and Rorschach. I found myself actually rooting for Rorschach's love life before I realized it was doomed from the beginning.

Comment by Jason Marconnet (Pint sized mod) on August 2, 2013 at 6:07pm

I didn't love the Comedian series as much as everyone else. It has nothing to do with the character. It was a solid series. Well thought out and the story was good, especially that first issue. However, I like to think of Watchmen as an alternate history of sorts. This series felt like it was too grounded in our own history even with the few twists they threw in. Not a bad thing just took me out of it.


I really liked the Rorschach series. I was also rooting for his love life, should've known better.


Minutemen was probably the best of the lot. Solid all the way through. Cooke did a terrific job fleshing out the characters.


I recommend checking them all out when you get the chance. Before I got busy with work and let my comics pile up, the BW minis were the first books I read when I got home from the comic shop every Wednesday.


You need to be a member of Captain Comics to add comments!

Join Captain Comics


No flame wars. No trolls. But a lot of really smart people.The Captain Comics Round Table tries to be the friendliest and most accurate comics website on the Internet.









© 2020   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service