In the recent Joker/Daffy Duck comic (Side Note: The latest batch of DC/WB crossovers are neither especially good or especially bad), there's a scene in which the Joker kills the patrons of a comedy club and has his gang take their stuff (Another Side Note: Who in the Blue Hell would go to a comedy club in Gotham City? That's just asking for trouble!), and this scene inspired in me a sudden realization.

Now, I'll say up front that I'm sure I'm not the first person to have this realization (or the tenth, or the hundredth, or the thousandth...), it's just something that I never really thought about all that much before.

Anyway, the great realization was this:  

There's no (expletive gerund omitted) way that someone wouldn't have killed the Joker by now.  Victim's grieving relative, vigilante, fed-up cop, "accident in the cells", a villain who's sick of the Joker's crap - someone would have wasted him by now.   I can no longer sustain my suspension of disbelief as regards this character.

 

Views: 3457

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Dunno, but it's an interesting idea.

Randy Jackson said:

I don't know if this is necessarily the right thread for this, but has there ever been an attempt to portray Night Girl as a vampire? Given her powers only work in the dark that would kind of make sense and perhaps an interesting story--ideally non-canon. 

Some of us were discussing this cover elsewhere, and it prompted two questions on my part:

1)Were there really a lot of people requesting this specific team-up?

2)The next twelve issues of  Daredevil were all about Matt Murdock's recovery from the shattered bones he received when the Man-Thing bashed him against Ben's side like that, right?

I'm sure if anyone brought it up in a letter we'd have an explanation like "DD could feel himself moving toward Ben so he angled himself and bounced off with nothing more than bruises." Much as Spider-Man once hitting Captain Britain in the head with a girder was explained as using just the right angle to do nothing but knock Brian cold.

The Baron said:

Some of us were discussing this cover elsewhere, and it prompted two questions on my part:

1)Were there really a lot of people requesting this specific team-up?

2)The next twelve issues of  Daredevil were all about Matt Murdock's recovery from the shattered bones he received when the Man-Thing bashed him against Ben's side like that, right?

There was an issue of Daredevil when he took on the Hulk, with the next issue showing him laid up I. The hospital. 

I think the "because you demanded it" blurb usually meant that the guest stars were intended to increase the sales of Man-Thing or, in some cases, to increase the sales of the guest star's book. I'd be surprised if an actual reader demanded it.

Daredevil has no business taking on the Hulk.  That's not being a hero, that's being dumb.

Randy Jackson said:

There was an issue of Daredevil when he took on the Hulk, with the next issue showing him laid up I. The hospital. 

It's quite possible that one individual reader asked for Shang-Chi, one for Daredevil, etc. So technically all four guest-stars are reader-demanded, just not combined as the Anti-Man Thing Gang.

Richard Willis said:

I think the "because you demanded it" blurb usually meant that the guest stars were intended to increase the sales of Man-Thing or, in some cases, to increase the sales of the guest star's book. I'd be surprised if an actual reader demanded it.

"Daredevil has no business taking on the Hulk."

Cool cover, though.

Depends on the circumstance. He was pitching out of his weight class when he went up against Namor in an early issue, but it worked.

The Baron said:

Daredevil has no business taking on the Hulk.  That's not being a hero, that's being dumb.

Randy Jackson said:

There was an issue of Daredevil when he took on the Hulk, with the next issue showing him laid up I. The hospital. 

I'm sure you're right, but it amuses me to imagine them getting tons of letters demanding this specific team-up.

Fraser Sherman said:

It's quite possible that one individual reader asked for Shang-Chi, one for Daredevil, etc. So technically all four guest-stars are reader-demanded, just not combined as the Anti-Man Thing Gang.

Richard Willis said:

I think the "because you demanded it" blurb usually meant that the guest stars were intended to increase the sales of Man-Thing or, in some cases, to increase the sales of the guest star's book. I'd be surprised if an actual reader demanded it.

The Baron said:

Daredevil has no business taking on the Hulk.  That's not being a hero, that's being dumb.

Fraser Sherman said:

Depends on the circumstance. He was pitching out of his weight class when he went up against Namor in an early issue, but it worked.

Randy Jackson said:

There was an issue of Daredevil when he took on the Hulk, with the next issue showing him laid up I. The hospital. 

Jeff of Earth-J said:

"Daredevil has no business taking on the Hulk."

Cool cover, though.

A cover that MADE me buy the comic. As I said over here (in the thread "Covers That MADE You Buy the Comic"): "When you see this image, you can only think: How dead and mangled is Daredevil going to be when this match is over?"

"A cover that MADE me buy the comic."

Me, too!

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Luke Blanchard replied to Captain Comics's discussion Bond #6: 'Dr. No'
"I interpreted the book as an exploration of what a Fu Manchu-type would be like in the real world.…"
23 minutes ago
Luke Blanchard replied to Captain Comics's discussion Bond #6: 'Dr. No'
"I interpreted the book as an exploration of what a Fu Manchu-type would be like in the real world.…"
23 minutes ago
Luke Blanchard replied to Eric L. Sofer's discussion R.I.P. Joe Giella
"Mr Giella worked in newspaper strips into the internet era."
1 hour ago
Richard Willis replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
1 hour ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"To your first point, yes, this story is now a Mopee because it injects The Shadow into…"
6 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to The Baron's discussion Movies I Have Seen Lately
"DANGEROUS CHARTER (1962): "Mystery, intrigue and death ride the high seas in this…"
6 hours ago
Richard Willis replied to Eric L. Sofer's discussion R.I.P. Joe Giella
"A wonderful (1998) interview. Nineteen-minute Youtube video. Saw many photos of comics…"
7 hours ago
Richard Willis replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"I had an issue with two covers at least once. I just carefully removed the front cover. I had (and…"
8 hours ago
Richard Willis replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Since this is a 1974 issue, I must have read it. It sounds like a mopee for two reasons. (1) DC…"
8 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to Steve W's discussion Comical Comic Cuts
8 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"It's been a long time since I've read that story, but it affected Young Bruce a great…"
8 hours ago
Irma Kruhl replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Keen Detective Funnies #10 (1938)"
9 hours ago

© 2023   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service