For me so far:

Amazing Spider-Man: No.  There's some interesting ideas in here, but not enough to spare some of my limited budgets of comics money/reading time.

Guardians of the Galaxy:  Yes. Just interesting enough to give them a chance.    
                                   
The New Avengers: Yes. So far, they seem to be treating Squirrel Girl well.        
                                   
Spider-Gwen: Yes. So far, they've maintained the quality from the previous book.      
                             
The Uncanny Avengers:  Maybe. It's mildly interesting, but I really don't like Deadpool.      
                   
How about you?

Views: 1942

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's the same principal. They're making sure people know there's another issue coming out next month just as TV makes sure you know their show will be on again next week.

I haven't read any of those three titles because of the same reason. I loved the first issue or two of Gwenpool, but it steered too far in that direction. I'm happy that these titles exist, because I think they are made to appeal to female readers, but they're just not made for me.

Captain Comics said:

I caught up on December #1s, and got a bellyfull of "Batgirlization." I like that approach OK, but it was just too many at a sitting: Gwenpool, Starbrand & Nightmask, Hellcat, probably one or two I'm not remembering. It was a saccharine overdose.

That's probably also why Galactus restores worlds now instead of destroying them.

So other titles like Squadron Supreme are for "he-men" readers that like graphic violence then?

That may be the case. Maybe I've finally aged out of comics!

Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man said:

I haven't read any of those three titles because of the same reason. I loved the first issue or two of Gwenpool, but it steered too far in that direction. I'm happy that these titles exist, because I think they are made to appeal to female readers, but they're just not made for me.

Captain Comics said:

I caught up on December #1s, and got a bellyfull of "Batgirlization." I like that approach OK, but it was just too many at a sitting: Gwenpool, Starbrand & Nightmask, Hellcat, probably one or two I'm not remembering. It was a saccharine overdose.

We're not losing interest in comics, comics are losing interest in us.

If they were only making comics that appeal to us old fogies they wouldn't get new readers to replace us. Are they really attracting new readers? Fortunately the two big companies are now owned by movie companies which see them as valuable, so they can tread water for awhile.

Ron M. said:

We're not losing interest in comics, comics are losing interest in us.

That's the big question. Are they really attracting new readers? If so they don't need us old fogies. If not then they should think twice about losing us.

Ron M. said:

That's the big question. Are they really attracting new readers? If so they don't need us old fogies. If not then they should think twice about losing us.

They are going to lose us one-by-one and they know it.

No reason to speed up the process though. The longer they keep us the more time they have to build up a new audience.

I think the mainstream comic book audience turns over every four or five years. That obviously wasn't true 50 years ago, but I do think it is true now. The comics field today just isn't inspiring life-long fans anymore. Or maybe it's the fans themselves, always moving on the the next new thing.

Anecdotally, the people hanging around my LCS on Wednesdays now have more melanin and estrogen than in previous years. (They're still nerds, though.)

But will they still be there five years from now?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Latest Activity

Rob Staeger (Grodd Mod) replied to Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man's discussion What Comic Books Have You Read Today?
"But seriously, that Tarzan collection sounds great! I'm not a big Tarzan fan, but I had a…"
2 hours ago
Rob Staeger (Grodd Mod) replied to Wandering Sensei: Moderator Man's discussion What Comic Books Have You Read Today?
"Well, he's Tarzan. Looking good in a loincloth is pretty much his whole deal."
2 hours ago
Luis Olavo de Moura Dantas replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Swamp Thing
"Indeed.  Swamp Thing at this point may want to hold on to his humanity - or human traits, at…"
3 hours ago
Philip Portelli replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Their lack of cinematic success filled the JLA with shame! "
4 hours ago
Rob Staeger (Grodd Mod) replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Dark Shadows
"Haven't made a lot of progress, but I saw episode 589 last night.A lot of soap opera…"
4 hours ago
Randy Jackson replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Swamp Thing
"I personally found the story of these two issues not to be very interesting, but what I did really…"
5 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Cavaliere (moderator emeritus)'s discussion What are you watching right now?
"SWAMP THING (2019 TV SERIES): After we read the Bronze Age Swamp Thing in 2017, Tracy and I started…"
6 hours ago
Dave Palmer replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Let’s finish out Zero Patrol with a couple of “sword and sorcery” covers and a…"
6 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Swamp Thing
"ISSUE #42: The title of this story is "Strange Fruit." On page 18, Swamp Thing narrates:…"
7 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to ClarkKent_DC's discussion The New Season (2021)
"While we're all reflecting on This Is Us and how well it sticked the landing in its…"
7 hours ago
ClarkKent_DC replied to ClarkKent_DC's discussion 'This Is Us' -- Season 4 (and others)
"I never took to The Gilmore Girls (I've tried, but it just didn't take), and…"
8 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to Jeff of Earth-J's discussion Swamp Thing
"ISSUE #41: Where do writers get their ideas? In the case of Alan Moore, I think he often gets them…"
8 hours ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service