Deck Log Entry # 97 War-Horses of a Different Colour

In the society of Silver-Age mavens, there are Sergeant Rock fans and Sergeant Fury fans, and seldom does the twain meet. In a nutshell, the Rock fans find DC's World War II stories of Easy Company and its indomitable top-kick to be slices of the grim reality of war, while they regard Marvel's Sergeant Fury and his Howling Commandos as little more than super-heroes in G.I. khaki, not to be taken seriously. To Fury fans, that is the whole point; the escapades of Fury and his Howlers are meant to be romps, lavish exaggerations of old war films, a war magazine for people who hate war magazines.

As with most nutshell descriptions, these are oversimplifications. Not that there wasn't an essential difference in approach to the two WWII series---there was---but you had to boil a great deal away to get to that essence. I suspect that the readers who strongly gravitate to Rock or Fury, one or the other, made their choices after reading only a handful of issues of both series, and after that, their minds were made up.

DC's Sergeant Frank Rock had the virtue of appearing first, but only after the concept went through a few refinements. The prototype appeared in G. I. Combat # 68 (Jan., 1959), as a character nicknamed "the Rock", a professional boxer-turned-soldier who single-handedly held the line against a wave of attacking German forces. The next incarnation was "Sergeant Rocky", who appeared in "The Rock of Easy Co.", from Our Army at War # 81 (Apr., 1959). Here, most of the elements which would distinguish Sergeant Rock were introduced, the most important of which was Easy Company, the band of G.I.'s who would follow the Rock into Hell.

The following issue, Our Army at War # 82 (May, 1959), is generally viewed as the debut of the character as a complete entity, with all of the now-familiar features in place. Even so, it was still considered a series about various soldiers in Easy Company, with Sergeant Rock often simply a background player. This was the case for several more issues, until # 90 (Jan., 1960), when Rock finally emerged as the star of the show.


Marvel's Sergeant Nick Fury, however, underwent no such evolution. He sprang full-blown in Sgt. Fury and His Howling Commandos # 1 (May, 1963). As author Ronan Ro, among others, relates, Sergeant Fury was the result of a bet between Marvel's editor, Stan Lee, and his publisher, Martin Goodman. Goodman believed that the popularity of the Marvel titles was due to the hype on the covers. Lee insisted it was because of the combination of his writing and Jack Kirby's art. To prove it, Lee wagered that he could produce a war comic---generally slow-movers in the post-WWII era---and give it the worst title he could think of, and under the handling of himself and Kirby, it would sell.

Sgt. Fury debuted with all of the key elements in place: a grizzled, hard-bitten non-com in charge of a mixed band of wisecracking commandos, and taking their marching orders from an even more hard-bitten C.O. Fury and his Howlers sailed through occupied Europe, making jokes and shooting Nazis.


If you just looked at the pictures, there didn't appear to be a whole lot different between Sergeant Rock and Sergeant Fury. Rock was a master sergeant while Fury was a mere three-striper, but they shared the same taste for crewcuts, beard stubble, and ragged shirts. Rock was fond of going into battle wearing fifty-pounds of .30-06 ammo in bandoliers over his shoulders, while Fury was rarely seen without a cigar champed between his teeth. They both were capable of absorbing a staggering amount of punishment with little more than a grimace.

Nor did the men they led look, on the surface, to be all that different. Both Easy Company and the Howling Commandos presented casts of ethnically diverse regular characters, including black men (Jackie Johnson and Gabe Jones), at a time in American history when the real Army was still segregated by colour. Both groups had a big, brawny corporal as second-in-command.

The soldiers in both units tended to have colourful nicknames, such as Bulldozer and Wildman and Little Sure Shot for Easy and Dum Dum and Rebel and Junior for the Howlers. And one could pick out a few non-G.I.-issue "fashion statements" on both teams---the eagle feathers attached to Little Sure Shot's helmet, Wildman's definitely non-regulation beard, and Dum Dum's derby and striped long johns.

No, the difference between Rock and Fury lied in style.



Under DC editor Robert Kanigher, who also wrote nearly all of them, the Sergeant Rock tales tended to be excerpts from the panorama of war. The mission objective (if there was one---many of the stories seemed to consist of what happened to Rock and Easy Company as they slogged from Point A to Point B) was incidental to the events of the plot. Kanigher seemed intent on bringing to the readers as much of the horror of combat as the Comics Code would permit, and he did that by crafting human interest stories against the backdrop of war. He concentrated on the irony and caprice of human conflict. He showed how man's desires and ambitions, lovings and longings, amounted to nothing on the battlefield, in the grand scheme of fate.

The Nazis didn't always lose, and in nearly every issue, American G.I.'s died. Some of them were nameless and faceless, just as in real war, with only their tin pots propped up on rifles to mark their passing. Other casualties came from that particular story's "guest stars" and walk-on parts. They had names, or nicknames, and sometimes the reader got to know a little bit about them, just enough to feel for their deaths or to take a moral from it. Often, the victories of Easy Company felt hollow.

There wasn't getting away from some conventions, though. None of the hundreds of flying bullets ever had the name of a regular Easy Company character on it. Oh, sure, the Ice Cream Soldier died in Our Army at War # 107 (Jun., 1961), but Kanigher thought better of it (or didn't think of it at all) and the Soldier was resurrected without explanation three issues later.

Overall, though, Kanigher hit the target he was aiming at, even if the grimness seemed relentless.



There sure wasn't anything grim about the first handful of Sgt. Fury stories. They were pure, over-the-top high adventure. In each issue, Captain Sam Sawyer would hand Fury and his men their assignment, and getting there was nearly all the fun. German soldiers were little more than targets, straw foes to be mowed down by the Howlers' machine guns. These were curiously bloodless scenes, too, with little more than an off-panel "Uuuuhnnnnn . . . ." and a German helmet bouncing across the floor to mark another downed Nazi. Near-impossible feats, such as Dum Dum Dugan blowing up a German fighter plane with a hand grenade, were treated as just another day at the war.

It wasn't outright farce. Writer Stan Lee could insert an actual sense of drama into the Howlers' missions, enough to make the reader think, for a few moments anyway, that Fury and his boys could actually be up against it. Lee was also adept at basing events on actual historical fact, which contributed a veneer of believability, and while the rank-and-file German grunts were usually just stupid, the Nazis in command were hissably evil (not that they didn't do a good job of that in real life). So much that when Fury took them down, the readers cheered and overlooked the more hard-to-swallow aspects of it.

Another plus for Sgt. Fury was the feeling of comradery between the Howlers. The regular cast of Easy Company most often came across as just props to move the story along, or sometimes acted as a Greek chorus. But the Howlers had personality. They carried on like a true bunch of buds, and not a little of that came from the humorous wordplay. While the boys of Easy Company might occasionally do some mild kidding, the Howlers were downright funny, thanks to Stan Lee's arch sense of dialogue.

If there was any moral to an early Sgt. Fury tale, it was that Nazis were bad and loutish, Americans were good and decent, and the good guys always beat the bad guys.



If you were a comics fan in the early years of the 1960's, it wasn't hard to distinguish between DC's and Marvel's approach to World War II and make one's choice accordingly. Some readers could appreciate both styles and read both Rock and Fury, but mostly, people preferred one or the other. Pretty soon, though, that choice became harder.

DC had been in the war-comic business a lot longer than Marvel, and Robert Kanigher not only oversaw Our Army at War, but other, similar series---G. I. Combat, Star-Spangled War Stories, and Our Fighting Forces. With so many years of so many war tales, it probably was bound to happen, but Kangiher's plots lapsed into a set formula, one of a three-act play. It usually went something like this: a new soldier would join Easy Company, a newbie with an ambition (to win a medal), or a hobby (drawing comic strips), or a bad character trait (collecting war souvenirs). In act one, the New Guy's quirk would endanger Easy Company, and Sergeant Rock would chide him for it. In act two, again, the same thing, only worse, and Rock would smack the New Guy down hard. But, act three always ended in one of two ways: either the New Guy would learn for himself that what he was doing was a bad thing and cast it off just in time to save Easy Company; or that very thing he did would prove to save the rest of the company's bacon, and Rock would decide that maybe trying to win a medal or drawing comics or collecting souvenirs wasn't such a bad thing after all. As often as not, the New Guy would get killed in the end, driving the revelation home.

Sometimes, Kanigher would put a twist on it. Instead, it might be something personal, such as Rock trying to return a dead German soldier's wallet to his widow or searching for the one-armed Nazi tank commander that slaughtered some Easy rookies, but again the pattern of three would assert itself. The first two times, something would thwart Rock's goal, but he would achieve it on his third try.

It was a pattern as relentless as a drum beat. Boom. Boom. BOOM! And, after awhile, just as annoying.

And if you liked continuity, forget it. There was none in a Sergeant Rock story. Company commanders changed with every story. Soldiers died saving the whole unit, earning stirring we'll-never-forget-him speeches from Rock, and then were never mentioned, again. Rock or one of the Easy regulars could be critically wounded in this month's issue and be right back in action the next month, without even a band-aid. Not that it had to be a soap opera, but there was little sense of an on-going narrative, either.

Any given Sergeant Rock story, taken alone, was usually a commendable effort, telling of the reality of war. But the series taken as a whole, with stale pattern in place and no real continuity between stories, began to feel rather artificial.



Sgt. Fury, though, had begun to evolve. It started with quite a shock. At the climax of "Lord Haw Haw's Last Laugh", from issue # 4 (Nov., 1963), Howler Junior Juniper was killed in action. This was a stunner. Silver-Age comics fans had never experienced the death of a prominent regular character before. Moreover, Junior's death was not a moment of spectacular sacrifice, noblely giving his life to save his buddies or a town full of people he didn't know. No, the youngest Howler died the way most soldiers do in wartime, simply by happening to be in the way of a bullet. It could have been the guy standing next to him---but it wasn't.

This started a ripple of realism running through the series, one that slowly gained in effect. Junior was not forgotten by the next issue. Occasionally, the Howlers would mention him, usually bringing the grim reminder that any one of them could be next. That thought occurred to regular Sgt. Fury readers, too. They were now aware that none of the characters were exempt from death. The stories themselves continued to be romp-ish, but Junior's death had added a sense of unease.

Nearly two years later, Lee followed up with another blow, killing off Pamela Hawley, Fury's on-going love interest. Once again, it was a thing not forgotten. Memories of Pam and the tragedy of her death would revisit Fury over the course of his life right up to the modern day. This really marked the end of the "fightning Nazis is fun, isn't it?" attitude in the series. The Howlers were still the Howlers, pretty much tough to beat under any circumstances. But the wisecracks were more subdued; the war had turned serious. Plots began to expand, to explore the effects of Nazi oppression on its victims, depicting the quiet heroism of ordinary people. And, sometimes, their selfish baseness, too.

This change in theme was continued by Roy Thomas, after he replaced Lee as the series writer in 1966. Germans were no longer caracaturised as evil leaders and doltish thugs. Not all of Thomas' Germans were supporters of Hitler and some deckplate German soldiers were shown to be acting out of a sense of patriotism, just as American soldiers were. Fury and his men began treating the war as a grim necessity, rather than a grand adventure.

Fury was beginning to channel Sergeant Rock and was doing it better, now that the Rock series was becoming shopworn. When it came to showing the human interest side of warfare, nobody did it better than writer Gary Friedrich, who took over the Sgt. Fury title in mid-1967. Friedrich left his mark on the series with what became known as his "The __________" stories. "The War Lover" examined the actions of a kill-crazy G.I. and forced the readers to draw a line between justified killing in combat and what is, even in war, murder. "The Medic" presented the conflict between a soldier's duty to country and a healer's obligation to the suffering. "The Peacemaker" showed how someone may be blinded by his own ideals, while "The Assassin" went the other way, telling of a man who ignored his principles at the cost of his family and, ultimately, his humanity. "The Deserter," roughly based on the real-life case of Private Eddie Slovak, studied the nature of cowardice and debated how much bravery can be expected of a man.



By the end of the Silver Age, the difference in attitude between the two titles had narrowed. Sgt. Fury had matured into a more realistic, thought-provoking series. So why did it run out of steam in the 1970's, switching to every-other-issue reprints until its cancellation in 1974, while, stale or not, Sgt. Rock rolled right along, not ending until 1988? I'll leave that question to the Bronze-Age mavens out there.

Views: 656

Comment by ClarkKent_DC on January 16, 2010 at 11:24am
Well captured, Commander. I'm on record (somewhere, I'm sure) as being firmly on the Sgt. Rock side of the question, for all the reasons delineated above. Likewise, I take less interest in Sgt. Fury, for all the reasons mentioned.

Yes, Kanigher's formula got worn out through overuse, but although he wrote the lion's share of the stories, there were a few written by Bob Haney and more than a few written by Joe Kubert, and at least one written by artist Russ Heath.

One other point about the lack of continuity in Sgt. Rock stories: They always bounced willy-nilly along the time line. This month's issue might be set in Italy, next month's in the desert in North Africa, the following one in the winter in Germany, the one after that showing the Joes plowing through the hedgerows in France. There is a rough continuity, however: Rock enlisted in the Army shortly after Pearl Harbor, got a battlefield promotion to sergeant, and he and Easy made their way across North Africa, participated in the Anzio invasion in Italy and fought from one end of the boot to the other, went across France and from there into Germany, where they were at the war's end.

Along the way, Ice Cream Soldier died and then was brought back, but Zack the bazookaman lost an arm, and that stuck; he was replaced by a pair of guys, Short Round and Long Round (one actually fired the bazooka, the other carried his ammo). And there was a skipper (who was called only Skipper), a bald man with eyeglasses, who did appear somewhat regularly after other anonymous skippers came and went.

How did Sgt. Rock the title survive nearly 15 years after Sgt. Fury the title met with cancellation? Beats me, but then, I wasn't a Sgt. Fury (or a Sgt. Fury) fan. I'd chalk at least part of the reason up to the gorgeous artwork Russ Heath was doing in the mid-'70s -- I actually preferred Heath on the book over longtime artist Kubert. But after Heath, there was old-timer George Evans, a few issues by the great John Severin, and a long, long run by Frank Redondo, one of DC's stable of artists from down in the Phillipines.
Comment by Luke Blanchard on January 16, 2010 at 6:21pm
If I might be pardoned for nit-picking, the GCD, probably following the indicia, lists the title as Sgt. Fury to #120, and Sgt. Fury and His Howling Commandos after that. Under the latter name it continued as an all-reprint title until late in 1981.

From what I can tell for the last year before the switch the stories were all-new, but the title went to a bimonthly schedule.
Comment by Travis Herrick (Modular Mod) on January 16, 2010 at 7:08pm
Nice write-up Commander. I haven't really read much Sgt. Rock, nor any of the old Furry stuff. I should give both of them a chance and see which one I do prefer.
Comment by Randy Jackson on January 17, 2010 at 9:09pm
I can't really say much about Sgt Fury and His Howling Commandoes as I don't think I've ever actually read a single issue of the comic (c'mon Marvel, where are those Essentials), but I have read a pretty fair number of Sgt. Rock stories.

Yes, they were formulaic. Yes, regular cast members were killed and resurrected frequently. However, I don't remember many bad Sgt. Rock stories, and that may be why they showed the longevity that Sgt. Fury didn't--the stories were simply more consistently satisfying to the readers.

I also wonder if the Nick Fury: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. stories were actually pulling readers away from SFAHHC. Perhaps fans were getting their fill of Fury in the comics set in modern day. Or perhaps it was seen to be "uncool" to read Marvel war comics at the time, especially considering how much effort had been put in to make Marvel's readership seem like some sort of elitist club where stories that glorified anything about war were passé.
Comment by Figserello on January 17, 2010 at 10:45pm
Or perhaps it was seen to be "uncool" to read Marvel war comics at the time, especially considering how much effort had been put in to make Marvel's readership seem like some sort of elitist club where stories that glorified anything about war were passé.

Considering that Sgt Fury and his etc were for years the only comics brought out by Marvel that dealt with recent historical wars at all, it's hard to see where this statement comes from.

And the Cold War was ....er.... cool enough for Stan to use as a backdrop for a lot of his 60's work. (A very jingoistic, uncomplicated view of it too, rather than an elitist anti-war stance.)

If war in general couldn't have been too passe in this era, as Marvel called two of their biggest stories of the time The Avengers Defenders War, and The Kree-Skrull War.

Rather than a Marvel policy, it was probably the nightly news reports from Vietnam that put people off simplistic war stories.
Comment by Commander Benson on January 18, 2010 at 1:22am
Thanks for all the responses, guys. Somehow, doing a ________ vs. _________ column always generates replies.

"One other point about the lack of continuity in Sgt. Rock stories: They always bounced willy-nilly along the time line. This month's issue might be set in Italy, next month's in the desert in North Africa, the following one in the winter in Germany, the one after that showing the Joes plowing through the hedgerows in France. There is a rough continuity, however . . . .

"Along the way, Ice Cream Soldier died and then was brought back, but Zack the bazookaman lost an arm, and that stuck; he was replaced by a pair of guys, Short Round and Long Round (one actually fired the bazooka, the other carried his ammo). And there was a skipper (who was called only Skipper), a bald man with eyeglasses, who did appear somewhat regularly after other anonymous skippers came and went."


You're right in that there was a rough continuity to the Rock stories, CK, but you had to be a true devotee to follow it, precisely because the stories bounced back and forth along the time-line. In fact, Kanigher used to insist that the stories in which the Ice Cream Soldier appeared after his death took place before his demise. I'd bet if one examined the chronology of the stories in view of that, the time-line would really be screwed up.

And yes, there were some attempts to have a straight-line, referential continuity when the series got into the '80's. I remember the story where Zack Nolan, the bazookaman, was wounded. It was depicted at the time as only an injury to his arm, which I immediately wrote off as one of those where he would be back next time without even a scar to show for it. So I was very surprised a few issues later, when it was revealed that the wound had required his arm to be amputated and he was being sent Stateside.

And I do remember that the bald-headed, bespectacled captain appeared frequently. I recall one exchange of dialogue where the skipper remarks to Rock, "What is the men's nickname for me---the Bald Eagle?" And Rock replies, "No, sir---the Eagle." (With a virtual wink to the readers.)


"Yes, they were formulaic. Yes, regular cast members were killed and resurrected frequently. However, I don't remember many bad Sgt. Rock stories, and that may be why they showed the longevity that Sgt. Fury didn't--the stories were simply more consistently satisfying to the readers."

I think that was half the reason, Randy. As I mentioned, Kanigher's Rock stories, taken individually, were eminently satisfying. But your comments and Figserello's prompted a thought in my mind. Kanigher's agenda, as it were, in writing the stories was to tell of the misery of war, along with the occasional human victory. But he had no political agenda---he wasn't trying to reflect any on-going real-world conflict, or take a hawk or dove stance. He just told stories about war, as he understood it. And that's what kept the series going.

I think that's where Sgt. Fury took its downturn. Gary Friedrich did a masterful job of examining the human dimension of war, especially in his "The _________" stories, which I mentioned. But somewhere along the line, in the early '70's, he and the occasional fill-in writers began to take a distinctly political anti-war stance. Friedrich may have intended that all along, but it was less blantant in his mid-'60's stories.

And I'll grant you, that may have been an effort to regain a dwindling audience, turned away from any kind of war magazine in light of the popular antipathy toward the Viet Nam War. That's what probably killed Sgt. Fury. The shift to the anti-war stance didn't register with the peacenik readers because they weren't reading the mag anyway, and it turned away the conservative fans that the title had left.
Comment by Luke Blanchard on January 18, 2010 at 4:02am
I'd note that Marvel likewise stopped producing new westerns and newsstand anthology horror comics, while DC stuck with them. Also, that DC persevered with other war series - The Haunted Tank, The Losers, The Unknown Soldier. I guess both companies produced comics in the 70s in a range of genres, but DC may have been more committed to this approach. Marvel's product was probably more driven by what the writers wanted to do than DC's. (Before Shooter took over the company's editors and writers were largely the same people, while DC had a distinct editing staff.)

Steve Englehart has written that he contributed to the scripts for Sgt. Fury #94 and #97.

Incidentally, for those who don't know, Marvel tried two new war titles in the 70s, Combat Kelly ("and his Dirty Dozen") in 1972-73, and War is Hell, which started off as a reprint title but ran new stories in 1974-75, in the second half of its run.
Comment by Commander Benson on January 18, 2010 at 4:20am
"Marvel's product was probably more driven by what the writers wanted to do than DC's. (Before Shooter took over the company's editors and writers were largely the same people, while DC had a distinct editing staff.)"


An excellent point. In fact, as I recall, it was that "editor = writer" approach at Marvel that led to some of the more excessive flights of fantasy---some of them worked, most of the didn't---that Shooter reigned in when he became E-i-C. Having the yoke put on them led to resentment from a number of the writers. Boo hoo.

The fact that, while DC introduced the "young Turk" writers in the late '60's-early '70's, the editors were still from the "old guard" (except for Dick Giordano). Robert Kanigher probably nixed anything getting too near to a political statement in DC's military titles.
Comment by doc photo on January 18, 2010 at 9:29am
Spot on analysis, Commander! Having an entire line of war comics was both an advantage and disadvantage for DC. With Easy Co.,The Haunted Tank, Johnny Cloud the Navajo Ace and of course The War That Time Forgot DC had a variety of "combat happy joes" to choose from and I always enjoyed the 80 Page Giants that collected stories from each of the different series. But, as you mentioned, each series eventually fell into a fairly rigid formula. Over at Marvel, other than a brief run of Captain Savage, the focus was entirely on the Howling Commandos. Early on my preference was for the more realistic DC fare, Fury being a bit over the top for my tastes. Still, the Friedrich, Ayers, Severin run on Sgt.Fury was as good as anything that had come from the competition. If I had to choose one company over the other in regards to war comics, my choice would be DC - I'm a sucker for Joe Kubert art. In my book, Kubert is the best war comics artist period. Even if the stories were a bit weak, Kuberts art saved the day.
Comment by Jeff of Earth-J on January 18, 2010 at 11:36am
I enjoyed reading this article quite a bit, Commander. When I was younger, I didn’t particularly care for either Sgt. Rock or Sgt. Fury (or war comics in general for that matter), but these days I like them both, mostly for the reasons you highlighted in your comparison/contrast. I haven’t read much beyond DC’s Sgt. Rock Archives and Marvel’s Sgt. Fury Masterworks, but now you’ve got me eagerly anticipating future releases in each respective series.

Comment

You need to be a member of Captain Comics to add comments!

Join Captain Comics

Welcome!

No flame wars. No trolls. But a lot of really smart people.The Captain Comics Round Table tries to be the friendliest and most accurate comics website on the Internet.

SOME ESSENTIALS:

RULES OF THE ROUND TABLE

MODERATORS

SMILIES FOLDER

TIPS ON USING THE BOARD

FOLLOW US:

OUR COLUMNISTS:

Groups

© 2019   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service