Replies

  • How do you mean, "loses the rights to his powers"?
  • Never mind, just re-read the article.
  • Dang. Work filter won't let me. Oh, well, I shall look at it next time I'm in the library. Thanks for the link, though!
  • So it's not the powers, but the origin story they could lose the rights to use. I wouldn't worry -- DC will pay the Siegels for the rights, either buying them outright or a long-term lease.
  • OK, "powers" is what got me. Most of Superman's powers are so generic - strength, speed, flight - I couldn't see how you could copyright them.
  • I noticed they have just published 'The Greatest Superboy Team-ups' or somesuch in TPB. I didn't notice it in the comicshop at first because Alan Davis hadn't drawn the round-faced Superboy I'm used to.

    Considering that there has been some kind of block on DC reprinting/using Superboy for a while now this is a good sign. They seem to publish these standard colour collections shortly before the Showcase/Essential versions, so it's looking good for behind the scenes deals and Superboy reprints...
  • Ah. Finally got to look at it. Well, since I haven't read the Superman comics on a regular basis in years, I suppose I'm not too worried about it. I suspect that Rob is right - a crapload of money will change hands, and things will go on as they have been.
  • True. It would be incredibly "inconvenient" for DC for any other situation to occur.
  • My understanding is DC holds Superman trademarks. Also, DC should still own the vast majority of published Superman stories. So the Siegel and Shuster heirs are probably in a strong position in relation to DC, but they also probably have an interest in keeping DC interested in continuing to publish Superman.
This reply was deleted.