Report what comic books you have read today--and tell us a little something about it while you're here!

Views: 62504

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ah, OK! Because even at $205, it seemed really overpriced.

To Richard Willis, et al.

Public libraries are everywhere.

Try a Google search for your specific area.

By the way, your emoji didn't appear well, or was that the point?

Retired from library work a little over a year ago, but I'm still a big fan (and user). I do a lot of my current comics reading using the Hoopla service, which I heartily recommend. Check to see if your local library offers it. If you've got a reasonably large tablet (I have a Fire HD 10) you can download your loans on there, and it's just like using Comixology. Of course most libraries also collect physical graphic novels, too. 

Something's wrong with the emoji.

I was kidding you about your typo, pubic library.


I didn't even realize I had such a typo until just now. Sorry folks.

Haha! It's all good, man!

Lee Houston, Junior said:


I didn't even realize I had such a typo until just now. Sorry folks.

First I’ll start off with a couple of reprints before moving on to this week’s originals…

MMW HULK v13: Back in 1976/77 I gave up comics… for 15 whole months… because I thought I had outgrown them. This volume overlaps 11 of those months and goes two beyond. It represents that last of Len Wein’s run and the beginning of Roger Stern’s. Ending with #222, this volume sets up a great jumping on point for v14. Also included in v13 is Annual #6 (which I read last night), by DAK and Herbe Trimpe, introducing the Enclave’s “Paragon” (who later became “her”).

HULK #324 (“True Believers”): Every once in a while I buy one of these TB reprints because they’re such a good bargain. I don’t usually buy one if I already own a reprint on nice paper stock, but Al Milgrom’s Hulk has yet to be reprinted. Sandwiched between two classic runs (John Byrne’s short one and Peter David’s lengthy one), Milgrom’s is often over-looked. I didn’t care much for his run in general, or this issue in particular, when initially released, but both have since grown on me. #324 is the first appearance (since issue #1) of the gray Hulk. Marvel is spotlighting Hulk’s “strange transformations” in it TB line to complement the “Devil Hulk” story currently running in Immortal Hulk.

THE ORVILLE #3: “The Word of Avis.” Part one of a two-parter about faith and religion.

HASHTAG: DANGER #5: My favorite of the AHOY! Comics titles.

INVADERS #9: Will wait for Richard Mantle’s “Complete Invaders” to comment.

POWER OF X #4: I’ve read it; now I’m waiting for ‘Tec to explain it to me.

I had to smile  at your comment about outgrowing comics. Maybe it's universal? I had the same mental process in the  late 1970s and early '80s, when I found I wasn't really enjoying much from the Big Two. It all seemed so ... repetitive and pointless. I thought about quitting. "When my monthly bill at Westfield goes over $200," I thought grimly, "I will quit cold turkey."

Then the indies like Grimjack, Cerebus, American Flagg! came along, forcing the Big Two to get better as well, and I realized I hadn't outgrown comics -- I had just outgrown bad comics. Needless to say, I didn't quit.

I kinda have a question for the group. I have always intended to replace my SIlver/Bronze comics with hardback collections (and sell the original floppies), but of course Marvel and DC keep throwing me curves. I stopped buying Marvel Masterworks when the Omniboo came along, but to my consternation they started coming out really grudgingly. The Masterworks are well into the Bronze Age -- the MMW Hulk you describe, Jeff -- but the Hulk Omnibus line is still at ... volume 1? I'm kinda considering returning to the MMWs, and waiting for the Omnibuses to catch up (back-issue MMW are ridiculously overpriced). What do y'all think? Will I end up wasting money again?

Meanwhile, what I'm reading:

I just finished the latest PS ArtBook, which collects Space Action #1-3 and World War III #1-2 from Ace (1952-53). And boy, are they bad.

Space Action is fairly typical of space opera at the time, which has rocket ships and "rays" that do whatever the plot requires. Meanwhile, the plots are basically medieval stuff with kings and queens and scheming advisors and all that sort of stuff, with ray guns replacing swords and space ships replacing horses.

It really doesn't age well. I mean, the stories are dopey, but even worse is the bad science -- bad even for the time. Bad like people living on Jupiter, the vacuum not being really so bad, breathable air everywhere and having to pass every single planet to get to Pluto, like they're always lined up all the time.

Like I said, I think this is fairly typical for the time. Most of the other SF I've read from other early '50s publishers -- PS ArtBooks is branching out into SF and crime -- is about at the same level. But wow, it's almost unreadable now. I wonder if it was then, too, given how short run most of these titles are.

Meanwhile, World War III is outright propaganda AND bad science.

First the propaganda. The covers and intros shriek that this sort of thing will happen if we aren't ALERT and WATCHFUL and don't find Commies under every bed. It also will mention once in a while how we'd do better in this war if Congress wasn't failing to pass billion-dollar budget supplements. Hmm.

So you have to have a high tolerance for jingoism to get through that sort of crap. Meanwhile, the action is very World War TWO.

That's the bad science. Basically these are World War II stories, if we had fought the SOviet Union and they had sprung a sneak attack. All the story beats are familiar, with the chicken guy who gains his courage and the competitive brothers who learn to appreciate each other's unit. The combat is strictly conventional, despite everyone putting "atomic" in front of everything. The atomic bombs the Russians drop on us are like really big bombs, that only destroy parts of cities and there is no discussion of radiation at all. Instead of the reality, of course, where a single nuclear bomb can wipe out an area the size of Ohio, and there will be multiple targeted on major cities, and no one will survive and the areas will be irradiated for millennia. And the bombs have to be delivered by airplanes, as if missiles don't even exist. (Maybe ICBMs didn't exist yet -- I'd have to look that up.)

Anyway, since the "atomic" bombs really aren't, America is able to rally after the sneak attack and return the favor. (But we, of course, don't target civilians.) There are dogfights, "ramming" airplanes, really big aircraft carriers, and ground battles that could be lifted from a Charlton war book of the time (only putting "atomic" in front of "hand grenade" and "mortar" and "land mine" and so forth). And despite all that "atomic" hardware on the battlefield, none of those weapons seem any stronger or different than the non-atomic variety. Also, of course, there is no radiation.

This is propaganda, too, in that it suggests we could survive an atomic war. New flash, 1950s people: Nobody will survive a nuclear exchange. Some will die quickly, but everyone will die from lack of food (nuclear winter) or radiation poisoning of the air and water worldwide. I get kinda angry when anybody suggests anything else, because the suggestion makes the possibility that much more likely.

The Harlem Hellfighters - A graphic novel by Max Brooks and Caanan White about the African American  369th Infantry Regiment, who fought in World War I. It was terrific, although a fictional story it does include events that actually happened, and some of the characters were actual soldiers. It is something I knew nothing about honestly. Highly recommended.

The Terrible Elisabeth Dumn Against the Devils in Suits - A man makes a deal with the Devil to become rich and successful. After 25 years the Devil gets his son's soul as payment. Well times up, and the Devil comes to collect. The dude make him another offer, takes his daughter Elisabeth instead. The Devil agrees, and a story ensues. Another really good comic. There a bunch of "deal with the Devil" stories, but this one has its own spin on it, and has some new elements. There is also a Robert Johnson-like character and that was fun.

"Take my daughter instead!" What a d*ck.

Skipper, World War III sounds a lot  like  Invasion USA (1952), which was featured in the sixth season of Mystery Science Theater 3000,  It portrays World War Three as being  like World War Two, down to using footage of the  London Blitz to portray a nuclear attack on New York City.  (It does feature Noel Neill and Phyllis Coates in a scene together, so there is that.)

For most people  in the 1950's, World War Two was their only referent for a global war, so that's why they tended to see it in those terms.


For what it's worth, I hang on to my original issues whenever possible.

Collections of Silver and Bronze Age material don't include things like house ads, letter columns, or reprints; especially in regards to the 48, 52, 80, and 100 page issues.

All those volumes offer is what was then the new material plus the cover, so you get the "main event" of that issue without the true flavor of the times involved.

Now if you're talking in regards to anything published past the original Crisis On Infinite Earths, that's a different matter.

If the collection is about the same price as the sum total of the original floppies involved or you can buy it on sale, I'd say "go for it", because a lot of publications today just don't have the "feel" of their predecessors, if you know what I mean.

Just my 2 cents on the subject.

Reply to Discussion



Latest Activity

The Baron replied to PowerBook Pete, the Mad Mod's discussion Anything, Everything, or Nothing At All
"This came up in my Facebook memories today, something made for me by the late, great Rich Lane:"
1 hour ago
Lee Houston, Junior replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Except for the pinkish Iron Man and Thor's pink highlights, the Avengers cover doesn't…"
2 hours ago
Dave Palmer replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"From Tom…"
3 hours ago
Philip Portelli replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"There was one more Zatara appearance on an Action Comics cover, a full cast shot! "
4 hours ago
Richard Willis replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Philip Portelli said: Zatara and Zatanna!  Surprisingly none of the "Zatanna's…"
4 hours ago
Lee Houston, Junior replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Steve W, et al: A March 1971 cover date is correct but if Charlton adhered to the general practice…"
4 hours ago
Steve W replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Mmmm - first alternate cover? You could be right - I'm guessing your covers come from 1971. I…"
4 hours ago
Lee Houston, Junior replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"I was originally going to ask this yesterday, but does anyone know what the first comic book with…"
5 hours ago
Captain Comics posted a video

VERSUS | Radiant Black vs. Blaze

From the pages of Radiant Black #15 comes: VERSUS. Can today’s modern day hero Radiant Black hold his own against, Blaze, one of the greatest heroes of C.O.W...
5 hours ago
Philip Portelli replied to Steve W's discussion A Cover a Day
"Zatara and Zatanna!  Surprisingly none of the "Zatanna's Search" issues had the…"
5 hours ago
Captain Comics posted a discussion

'Batman & Superman: Battle of the Super-Sons' animated movie comes to Blu-ray/Digital on Oct. 18

6 hours ago
Jeff of Earth-J replied to The Baron's discussion Movies I Have Seen Lately
""Which version of Annie?""
7 hours ago

© 2022   Captain Comics, board content ©2013 Andrew Smith   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service