So, are we ready to talk about this?
My first comment is that it didn't feel like a three-hour movie -- it felt like they packed four hours of story into it. I felt sometimes like I was drinking out of a firehose. Maybe it was because I loved just about everything. Here's my firehose of comments:
- There was certainly more characterization than I expected. Glad to see it.
- Loved Cap vs. Cap. (I write about it in this week's column.)
- Loved Professor Hulk (Ditto.)
- Surprised they chose to kill Black Widow, and disappointed that it was in exactly the same way as Gamora. I could have gone for a new approach to obtaining the Soul Stone -- I mean, surely the Avengers are more creative problem-solvers than Thanos. But I suspect that it will play into the Black Widow movie in some way, and establish a replacement Widow. (Either Yelena "Black Widow II" Belova or a re-cast of Natasha.)
- And my first thought when Widow was killed was "Damn. Should have been Hawkeye." I'm sorry, but Natasha was interesting, and Hawkeye is not. (Oh, how odd, he's a family man! Yes, odd for a superhero -- but not interesting.) Also, I loved Jeremy Renner in American Hustle, but man, is he unattractive. If nothing else, I'd rather look at Scarlett Johansson.
- But obviously Hawkeye's got to be around for his Disney+ series, so my wife and I both kinda knew how that scene was going to play out. I still thought we saw too much of him. I mean, he's boring.
- Speaking of my wife, she cried throughout. She said she hadn't cried at a movie since she was 10. There's a heckuva review!
- That unidentified teenager at Tony's funeral? That was the kid from Iron Man 2, all grown up.
- So now we know how Loki survived. Well, a version of Loki, since the (sometimes contradictory) description of time travel in this movie would indicate that they created an alternate timeline, and that timeline's Loki is the one that survived, and all we need for Hiddleston to star in his Disney+ series is to find a way for alt-Loki to get to our dimension. Piece o' cake.
- Speaking of which, Steve Rogers created an alternate timeline when he stayed with Peggy. That's where the shield came from. (Thanos destroyed the one from our dimension.) When Falcon says the shield feels like it belongs to someone else, Cap says "It doesn't" -- which could mean that it now belongs to Sam, or it could mean that it used to belong to alt-Sam in Cap's other dimension. (And how did our Cap get back here, anyway? Questions abound!)
- Some critics have complained that Thor taking Mjolnir from the past should have repercussions. That's a dog that doesn't hunt, because we saw it on the stand with Cap when he went back in time to replace the Infinity Gems. IOW, it as obvious he meant to return Mjolnir to its place in the timeline, too.
- I'd like to have seen that. Man, I'd watch a whole series of Chris Evans replacing stuff in time.
- Evans was so, so good in the role. Now does everyone see why Captain America has always meant more to me than just another superhero? It's not his strength or whatever -- it's his philosophy. He represents the best of men, writ large.
- The replacement Gamora is from before her time with the Guardians, which softened her considerably. She is essentially a villain again, like she currently is in the comics. She and her sister could cause some trouble. I suppose that's what Guardians 3 will be about. I don't know if that will include Thor, because Hemsworth's contract is up, too. I guess we'll see.
- Some critics have noted that the only significant, multiple-movie player that didn't appear in Endgame was Eric Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard). I beg to disagree. Since death is no barrier (with all the time traveling), we could have seen anybody, and we didn't see a number of multiple-movie characters such as Ronan, Odin, Sif, Darcy, Phil Coulson, Vision, the Nova Corps, Sharon Carter and probably a few more I'm not thinking of. Technically we didn't see Jane Foster, because the clips we saw of her were taken from Thor: The Dark World. (although Natalie Portman did do new dialogue that was dubbed in).
- Speaking of which, they sure did a deep dive on a number of characters. It was surprising to see Frigga, Jane Foster (sorta), Jasper Sitwell, Brock Rumlow, Jarvis and others.
- Speaking of Jarvis, that character, as played by James D'Arcy, has never been in the movies before. He was in Agent Carter. Is he the first Marvel TV character to make the leap into the Marvel movies?
- I really liked seeing Cap and Peggy dance. That was a running line all through Captain America: The First Avenger, and has been referenced a time or two since. They both earned that dance.
- Cap looking through the glass at Peggy, Tony meeting his father, Thor talking to his mother -- wow, they went all out trying to make us cry. And it worked.
- I laughed out loud when Cap repeated the elevator scene from Captain America: The Winter Soldier, and got the Stone without a fight by using the "Hail Hydra" line from Secret Empire. A callback to the comics, a clever ploy to avoid a fight, and a terrific thought experiment about how confused that left Jasper Sitwell. (Assuming that doesn't cause a separate timeline.)
- It's beautiful that Tony's last important words were the same as the ones that set this all in motion: "I am Iron Man." Evidently that was an ad lib in Iron Man! It sure carries weight now.
- Did Tony have to die? Yes. They established in a number of movies that no human could hold even ONE Infinity Gem, much less all six. Even the Hulk could barely survive it. Also, RDJ's contract was up, he has said on a number of occasions he wanted to leave on top and not as a ridiculous old man playing superhero, and he is already 54 (and starting to look it). Also, he made $75 million on Infinity War ALONE, and God knows how much he'll make for Endgame and how much he's already made on the other movies. He sure doesn't need the money.
- Which is one reason I don't think we'll see him as a hologram or AI program or something, as some have suggested. He would simply cost too much. If they do that, they'll probably re-cast with a lookalike/soundalike.
- WandaVision on Disney+ is supposed to be set in the '50s. That precedes Vision's death, but it also precedes his creation. (And Wanda's.) Given Wanda's power set, though, I guess anything is possible.
- Who will be the New Avengers? Captain Marvel and Captain America/Falcon seem like a lock, and I think it's been revealed that Spider-Man will be. Who else? We have a lot of options, despite the carnage: Ant-Man, Black Panther, Dr. Strange, Hawkeye, Hulk, Scarlet Witch, Thor, Valkyrie, Wasp and Winter Soldier leap to mind.
- Do you think they'll rename the Disney+ series Falcon and the Winter Soldier as Captain America and the Winter Soldier?
OK, I've wandered into mindless speculation territory. What did y'all think?
Replies
Drat! I started to write my response and lost it! I'll try writing again in another program and post it!
I loved this. It was a perfect capper to this phase, and it's clear that things will look different from here on out. That's a perfectly fine thing, and I look forward to it.
I think it quite telling that after so much anticipation there is very little discussion or debate being added to your opening statements Captain.
For once I think we all agree!
You summed up all the good, all the intriguing and all the (slightly) annoying - and we ALL feel the same.
This movie delivered an almost unique state of affairs - we all loved it and we all agree we did!!
(IMHO!)
Let's try this again ...
I saw Avengers: Endgame last night two nights ago. Some very random and out-of-order thoughts:
the McGuffinthe Infinity Gauntlet, we get Okoye, the Scarlet Witch, Shuri, Valkrie, Nebula, Gamora, Mantis, the Wasp and Captain Marvel line up(!) and let Spider-Man know, We got this. (Too bad the Scarlet Witch wasn’t there.)I saw a commercial for this movie which claimed Avengers: Endgame had the best opening weekend of all time. How can they make such a claim? How far into the future did they look? I’m sure some film will earn more money sometime. It probably had only the best opening weekend of all time so far.
Some additional thoughts:
ClarkKent_DC said:
Forgot to mention Pepper Potts was in that lineup.
Captain Comics said:
Since I have seen the movie I can now look at spoilers and commentary. Like this piece from The Washington Post: "This ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Battle Scene Captures Marvel's Tricky Relationship With Female Heroes." The writer doesn't use the term, but she argues that the Black Widow's demise was a case of Women in Refrigerators:
Sonia Rao said:
Loved your comments, CK!
CK: The writer doesn't use the term, but she argues that the Black Widow's demise was a case of Women in Refrigerators:
Yeah, killing off the Widow has some WIF overtones. And no funeral? We got two brief convos about her death (between Hulk and Cap, and Wanda and Clint) where I don't even remember her name being specifically mentioned.
CK: A while back, there was an Internet petition going around that the filmmakers should make a trailer with Ant-Man’s fast-talking buddy Luís doing a recap of the 22 previous MCU movies, in his own inimitable way, to help viewers get up to speed.
I would pay good, cash money to see that.
CK: we get Okoye, the Scarlet Witch, Shuri, Valkrie, Nebula, Gamora, Mantis, the Wasp and Captain Marvel line up(!) and let Spider-Man know, We got this.
That shot felt forced and pandering to me, but I would love to see the next Avengers movie take advantage of all those women. The movie doesn't have to be A-Force, but if the team was mostly female then most scenes would naturally be mostly (or all female). The next "Big 6" could be Captain Marvel, Wasp, Scarlet Witch, Shuri (in Panther armor), Valkyrie and Cap/Falcon. Oh, and Ant-Man as comedy relief/mascot.
Rescue is also available, but Paltrow says she's done, so probably not. Jessica Jones, Medusa and Colleen Wing/Misty Knight are established, although they're Marvel TV and not Marvel Films. Still, a mostly-female Avengers team could form organically, at least for a little while.
CK: When it’s time to get the band back together, and we meet Bruce Banner – and he’s Intelligent Hulk! (I didn’t understand why he needed glasses, though.)
I wondered about that, too. But as a guy heading for cataract surgery, I'm well aware that the causes of presbyopia, myopia and astigmatism have nothing to do with how strong you are. So I have rationalized that he needs readers because having big, strong eyes doesn't mean you can read tiny print well.
CK: but I thought it was shades of those Gardner Fox Justice League of America stories where he put Superman and Green Lantern out of commission on page 2 because if they participated in the adventure the story would be over on page 3.
They also sidelined the Hulk for most of the final big battle so that the Cap, Shellhead and Thor could have their (last) moment in the sun together.
CK: We spoke to a friend who saw the movie a week ago. Our friend said there was applause.
There was tons of applause at my showing, the first Saturday night (sold out, of course). I missed a lot of dialogue as a result, but I didn't mind.
CK: “I can do this all day.”
And then current Cap's exasperated response: "I know."
CK: It was noticeable that the movie spent a lot of time showing Stark alone with Morgan, and not with Stark, Pepper and Morgan together. I don’t think we ever did see all three of them together in a scene.
It was so noticeable that I noticed it. There were so many opportunities for Pepper to show up while Morgan and Tony were fooling around, and then she didn't, I began to think her contract was up and she wasn't going to show. Then she did, but without Morgan. Then Morgan and Pepper are together at the end, but Tony is dead. WTF?
CK: The movie also drove home the bond between Stark and Peter Parker. One of the better moves the Marvel Cinematic Universe made was setting those two up as surrogate father and son.
It seems to me that in the MCU, Tony is a stand-in for Uncle Ben.
I don't know if this is anything official, but has anyone else noticed that there are two separate Spidey supporting casts since the MCU/Sony deal? The Andrew Garfield/Tobey Maguire movies had J. Jonah Jameson, Harry Osborn, Mary Jane and Gwen Stacy, but none of those characters are in the MCU/Sony movies, which have instead Liz Allan, Flash Thompson, and some new characters. The villains from the Garfield/Maguire movies also no-shows at Marvel. The only holdover is Aunt May, who is sort of unavoidable. Does anyone know why this is? Is it part of the contract? Or is it just a way to make a clean reboot?
CK: My friend who saw Endgame before I did said he was expecting a moment where Thor got his act together, summoned the lightning, and was restored to his magnficent, god-like physique with six-pack abs, and was a little surprised it didn’t happen.
That thought flashed across my mind early, but I dismissed it -- it would be too cheap an out, and insulting to people struggling with weight. And the hammer doesn't say anything about "six-pack abs," just "the power of Thor." But when he did summon the lightning, he did suddenly have better grooming -- his hair and beard suddenly had braids!
There were assorted things I liked about the movie, but on the whole it's much weaker than INFINITY WAR. I think it's because the people behind the cameras knew that they were going to make a buttload of money no matter what they did, so they felt free to drop a lot of major plotlines (why was the Hulk unwilling to come out of Banner, how did the surviving Asgardians end up on Earth).
I've always opposed the concept of "women in refrigerators" because as stated by Gail Simone it ignores context. I can see women readers getting cheesed off by badly executed deaths or incoherent storylines. But WIR lumps together every story that involves "dis-empowerment" of women, so that even a good story like the original Phoenix continuity would fall under its aegis.
Now, I'm with the Captain in saying that on the emotional level, I'd rather have seen Hawkeye buy it than the Widow. The script puts out there that Hawkeye essentially becomes a version of the Punisher, randomly murdering criminals, and so there's some justification for him to want to pay for his (vigilante) crimes and sacrifice himself. Now, MAYBE a skillful script could have convinced me that BW had more gore on her conscience, and therefore she thought she deserved termination more-- but the movie didn't sell that. An alternate way to go would've been to establish that she had a relationship with Hawkeye's family and wanted them to survive, since BW could never have one of her own. But I don't think that was even suggested.
It's funny, though, that anyone would bring up WIR, since ENDGAME is so rife with shout-outs to feminine empowerment. Maybe that's the real reason they shafted BW: they had to make way for crude feminist icons like Valkyrie and the "Marvel that dare not speak her superhero name."
Did not like Fat Thor or Professor Hulk.
A.) Who is the "Marvel that dare not speak her superhero name"? I must have missed out on that one.
B.) I was fine with Fat Thor, but I LOVED Professor Hulk!
Gene Phillips said: