Hawkeye #17

What a piece of crap. 18 of its 20 pages were done in "funny animal" style. (Okay, I guess that makes it 90% crap.) I wish I had flipped through it befor I bought it. Oh, well. at least there were two issues of Stray Bullets last week to make up for it.

You need to be a member of Captain Comics to add comments!

Join Captain Comics

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I liked it. I thought the "funny animal" stuff was pretty good. Of course, I would have preferred they picked up where they left off, but I thought it was a fine issue.
  • I'm with Jeff of J.

    Had this been a Chris Eliopoulis special one-shot issue (outside of the regular series), it would have been one thing. But this one had a regularish-looking cover that fooled this reader into picking it up. It felt very very much like a filler issue.

  • 'When they make these comics less realistic, they make them less fun...'
  • First this title got delayed for 2 months between #12 and #13, and then there was a one month delay after #14.  Which was followed by the release of #16, and then #15 showed up a month later.  Now this nonsense.

    This book seems like it is completely off the rails.  Used to be a great book.  It's a shame.

  • It really is. Seriously. I'm not sure what's going on. I mean, it has to be an artist problem, right? Matt Fraction is writing it (well, most of it, judging by this last issue...). It's almost like he really wishes this was a Kate series, but he has to have some Clint in there also just to carry the title.

    Maybe Matt Fraction had a really great pitch, but it never really got beyond the pitch?

  • Interesting.

    To me, this series has always moved at a slow pace,and back and forth in time. So I don't have a problem with something like this--it reminds me of the Pizza Dog issue. Also, I like Chris Eliopoulis as an artist. I found this to be fun and charming.
  • I have a gut feeling this series may get rebooted soon, and probably without artist David Aja.  Here's a link to an article at Bleeding Cool that shows the original solicits for #17, 18, and 19 had to be moved around.  Aja's issue was moved from #17 to #19 and the other were bumped up.

    http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/01/27/more-hawkeye-changes-for-17-...

    In the comments, someone mentioned that Aja drew #9 (Apr) and #11 (June), and someone else drew #10 and #12.  Aja's next issue was #13 (Oct), which was 3 months after #12; his next issue was #15 (Feb) - which was released after #16.  And now #19, not #17, will be Aja's next issue.  He's clearly not able to do a monthly.

  • Yeah, that makes some sense.

  • I will say this. One day, this will all make a fantastic omnibus of very experimental storytelling with, hopefully, some back matter that will tell all about the crazy stories about the incredibly weird pacing of this book.

  • Sounds like that Spider-Man issue that was drawn by Fred Hembeck. Except back then there was a reason, it was meant for Assistant Editor's Month, and Marvel warned it would get weird that month.

This reply was deleted.