AMAZING SPIDER-MAN. “Once More With…”

[Richard Mantle]

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN. “Once More With…”
There are some interesting threads on this forum, already, covering issues of Marvel’s early series – ‘re-reading’’ of the Avengers and Journey into Mystery/Thor and so on and there was quite a good issue by issue thread on the Invaders around too, until it caught up with the present.
What is more rarely discussed are the later periods when these series were in full flow and while perhaps less iconic still number among them some classics… The examination of the Avengers from #101 onwards gets a credit here.
I therefore present to you an issue by issue critique/discussion forum for one of these mainstay Marvel titles.
Not beginning at the very debut – as others have that covered well – but (and I hope I don’t step on anyone’s creative toes here!) – I would like to pick up the Amazing Spider-Man title after a watershed/bookend issue provided an opportune point at which to begin …
Issue #50 featured that classic moment in Peter Parker’s life when he first thought he couldn’t go on and yet eventually realised he just couldn’t possibly give up being Spidey.
“Spider-Man No More!” draws breath for the title before it races on into it’s next phase – less discussed than the Ditko issues and the early Romita ‘End of the Green Goblin’ stuff the next issue builds on those early foundations and catapults our hero and the title to the second half of it’s first century of publishing and its next phase of greatness…
So, after “Spider-Man No-More!”
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN . “Once More With…”
…”With feeling…!”
Or…
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN . “Once More With…”
…”With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility…!”
Or…
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN . “Once More With…”
…”With in-depth discussion and critique…..
Or…
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN . “Once More With…”
…”With #51 (08/67)…..

Come back soon……

[Richard Mantle]

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #51 (08/67)
Writer – Stan Lee
Penciler – John Romita Inker – Mike Esposito
Cover Art – John Romita & Mike Esposito
“In The Clutches of...the Kingpin!”

 It’s a classic cover, simple but effective.

Refreshingly we see that Spider-Man is still struggling against a crime-wave that hit the city while he gave up being our hero in the last issue and the big bad Kingpin acts against our reinvigorated star and his critic J Jonah Jameson.

Jameson has also been verbal in his newspaper about the negative effects of such crime in the city, ole’ Kingy doesn’t like that.
Spidey battles the massive yet powerful and fast Kingpin one on one and actually well...loses.
We end with a tied together JJJ and Spidey about to drown as the bad guys appear to have won!

Joe Robertson appears for the first time too and Frederick Foswell is back (of course you remember the ‘Big Man’ don’t you?)

In view of the watershed moments of the last issue and this with a quite palpable ‘new phase’ being entered by Spidey, I expected the relationship with JJJ to mellow from this story onwards as surely JJJ will respect Spidey much more as clearly he can see our hero is not a villain and is trying desperately to help.
It doesn’t happen and the relationship remains defined as it always has been- in fact JJJ is remarkably manic and almost slapstick here.

I could have accepted the over the top behaviour, if it was the last of his excesses but in view of the fact that this does not represent any great understanding reached between them, this is almost painful.

The death-trap climax is very Adam West Batman camp actually.

Art is beautiful, large and bold.

The splash page of the Kingpin smashing a model of the city is typical of memorable images of the day.

I must say here and now, I like my Spider-Man drawn ...well...as a man – not a scrawny child.

Romita’s Spidey is powerfully built and adult sized, measuring up quite evenly against contemporaries like Captain America or Daredevil and that is one of the reasons why

 

I adore this period of ASM
The best phase begins when Doc Ock turns back up in #53...but until then we’ve still got to finish this set piece with the Kingpin.

Can Spidey escape from certain doom...?

Come back...

[Randy Jackson]

Yeah, Jameson never changes, no matter what.

[Jeff of Earth-J]

I used to re-read either the Ditko/Lee Spider-Man or the Romita/Lee Spider-Man ever year.It had been many years since I re-read either, so earlier this year I re-read all Spider-Man I had collected in hardcover (Marvel Masterworks, Omnibus or otherwise), so these are are really fresh on my mind. Romita is the definitive Spider-Man artist, and his run beats Ditko's hands down AFAIAC. In fact, I came to the conclusion earlier this year that I never need re-read the Ditko run in its entirety again.

[Richard Mantle]

I do agree Jeff. ASM#39 is where 'my' interest really begins.

I thought I had read lots of comments about those early Romita issues though (and the Annual guest-starring my favourite Avengers) so thought I'd start this thread with #51.

I am looking forward to the amnesia/Doc Ock issues and the 'tablet' epic soon...

Jeff of Earth-J said:

I used to re-read either the Ditko/Lee Spider-Man or the Romita/Lee Spider-Man ever year.It had been many years since I re-read either, so earlier this year I re-read all Spider-Man I had collected in hardcover (Marvel Masterworks, Omnibus or otherwise), so these are are really fresh on my mind. Romita is the definitive Spider-Man artist, and his run beats Ditko's hands down AFAIAC. In fact, I came to the conclusion earlier this year that I never need re-read the Ditko run in its entirety again.

[Richard Willis]

I agree that Romita's version of Spider-Man is more appealing to the public than Ditko's. As for Ditko's Spidey being scrawny, I think the point was that the radioactive spider-bite gave him his strength. He didn't get it by going to the gym every day. There are real people in the world who are strong without obviously bulging muscles.

ASM #51 was the second appearance of the Kingpin (#50 was the first). IMO Kingpin is the best villain from Romita's run. All of the classic baddies were designed by Ditko.

[Richard Mantle]

I wasn't necessarily meaning Ditko regarding scrawny but more the modern comics as they seem to try to accentuate the teenager and in my head Peter is way past that.

Richard Willis said:

I agree that Romita's version of Spider-Man is more appealing to the public than Ditko's. As for Ditko's Spidey being scrawny, I think the point was that the radioactive spider-bite gave him his strength. 

[Jeff of Earth-J]

Romita designed the Rhino.

Richard Willis said:

All of the classic baddies were designed by Ditko.

[Richard Willis]

Yes, I know. And I never liked the Rhino.

Jeff of Earth-J said:

Romita designed the Rhino.

Richard Willis said:

All of the classic baddies were designed by Ditko.

[Richard Mantle]

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN  #52 (09/67)

Writer – Stan Lee – Co-Plot-John Romita – Penciller

Inker – Mike  Esposito

Cover Art – John Romita

“To Die A Hero!”

Note to current artists – you can draw a poster-like cover while still depicting an event from the issue!

Beautiful cover with real menace and sense of action.

Inside and the unconscious Spidey is tied to the babbling manic JJJ in the centre of a basement being gradually but relentlessly flooded around them...

Spidey awakes and saves the day by weaving an airtight bubble of webbing around themselves before the room is drained and they escape the Batman-trap.

It’s pushing it a bit – airtight webbing? – but it is dramatic and satisfying.

Ned Leeds, Betty Brant and new supporting character Joe Robertson race into action realising JJ has been kidnapped.

Spidey fights the bad guys and JJ runs off …only to knock himself out.

Frederick Foswell stands up to the Kingpin because, despite his history as the ‘Big Man’, “cold-blooded murder just isn’t my style!!”

Spidey battles the powerful Kingpin again while Jameson wakes up.

 

The dripping water on JJ’s head making him think he was bleeding is a wonderful; sequence that whilst humorous is not actually played for laughs.

Foswell is shot in the act of helping Jameson escape – thus becoming the titular character who is “ To Die A Hero!”

The story ends with Spidey looking on as Jameson continues to distrust Spider-Man and the Kingpin has escaped to fight another day.

 

We also get a  return from the front line in Vietnam of Flash Thompson, fawned over by both Mary Jane and the , still quite angularly drawn Gwen Stacey. Flash is surprised to hear how popular Peter Parker seems to be whilst no one seems particularly surprised that Flash has got time off from military service he’d only just left to join hadn’t he..?

In a way this wrapped up ASM’s first half-century phase, helping to tie up all loose ends from earlier issues, redefine who everybody is and what their motivations are and launch Spider-Man onwards….

We are informed at the close that ‘Our next bombshell issue features the incredible villainy of…Doctor Octopus – Nuff Said? ….

…but first…a sideways extra in the shape of Amazing Spider-Man Annual #4…

 

Come Back…

[Jeff of Earth-J]

Regarding Spidey’s rouges gallery, Ditko may have created (or co-created) the lion’s share, but I think Romita improved upon them in every case. The ones Romita did create (or co-create) aren’t as well remembered, but I think lesser artists (and writers) who would reuse them in the years to come, didn’t use them to their full potential. The Shocker, for example, came to be seen as something of a joke by the ‘80s, but there’s nothing “jokey” about his two earliest appearances.

And, yes, Romita’s covers during this period were spectacular. Part of the problem (I have heard) concerning current covers not being as effective as those of the Silver and Bronze Ages is that the covers must be prepared so far in advance of the contents of the issue itself for solicitation purposes.

[Richard Mantle]

I agree about the Shocker - he had real potential.

Glad to have you aboard this thread too Jeff.

[Jeff of Earth-J]

Thanks. Sorry I missed the Invaders one. That's one of my favorite series, but I don't know it as well as I do Spider-Man or Avengers, and really needed to re-read it. Plus things were going on in my life, both personally and professionally, that limited my participation (and reading) at the time.