"Looking further, I think that's what happened. It's basically a one-off story in JLA in 1976, establishing the connection, with a follow-up that referenced it right as I started reading. And then the idea lay dormant for almost a dozen years, when,…"
"It happened in Justice League, issue 140 (unless I'm wrong and it was established before then). I don't know when that story began getting reflected in GL comics themselves, though. It might not have gotten into full swing in the Green Lantern comic…"
"I'm just going to stare incredulously at the words "(fairly) recent" and marvel at the difference in perspective age brings. Englehart and Dillon tied the Manhunters to the GLC 50 years ago, a couple months before I started reading comics, so it…"
"I think it's there, but it's all coming from people I've muted on Bluesky.I think we'll see another side to Hal eventually. I suspect some of his persona is an act because he doesn't trust John, and wants to keep him off balance and at a distance."
"Great list! I hadn't considered her working with Sinestro, but I can absolutely see it happening. And I think you're right -- Guy could enter the mix when John refuses the ring. And then, hopefully, gets a second ring of his own. But I also sure…"
"I'm behind on Supergirl, though trying to catch up -- the most recent issue of the regular run I've read was the Thanksgiving issue, which was delightful. (Not sure how Superman and Lois Lane arriving together didn't jeopardize his secret identity,…"
"That is an apt summary, but I disagree with the Windsor McCay comparison. Endless Nightmare is comparable to Little Nemo in Slumberland in only the most superficial way (such as the way Forbidden Planet is sometimes compared to Shakespeare's The…"
"I'm a fiend for Depression-era Superman (reading Tom De Haven's novel It's Superman! a few months ago rekindled that in me) and that's the one that evoked it best. I love the main cover too, but I had to go with Clark in the alley."
September is off to a strong start with a "Marvel Arts" book two weeks in a row.
(I cannot speak to the accuracy of the following summary.)
The latest book in the critically acclaimed, award-winning Marvel Arts…"
"I should also mention that I'll be excited to read Six of Us when it's collected. It seems like a cool premise, although I hope it keeps the actual Friends easter eggs to a minimum.I like that alt cover that looks like a torn Entertainment Weekly."
"Well, it looks like the Manhunter was revealed in Lanterns Episode 4. I won't say who it is.. I'll just say that I have my doubts. If there's anyone who's doing what the aliens say Manhunters do -- insinuating themselves into a community and…"
"I think Gotham Central was a little less of "the Crispus, Maggie, and Renee show" than hindsight suggests, Cap. I reread the series in omnibus form last year, and there are a fair amount of stories starring or co-starring the other shift of…"
Rob, now maybe, with your godlike powers of moderation, you can help me with something.
As I typically do, when I post one column for approval, I go back to the previous one, correct all the errors/typos which escaped all of my prior proofreading, and submit that previous one for (re)approval.
When I posted my current Deck Log Entry (the Legion Quiz), I also reposted the previous "Mars or Bust!" entry, after cleaning it up. Usually the reposted column gets approved at the same time the new one is.
But for some reason, the "Mars or Bust!" column is still waiting approval. I don't know who the system decides what moderator gets what stuff to approve, but if you can give me an inkling on how to get "Mars or Bust!" reapproved, I'd appreciate it.
Rest easy, friend . . . you didn't screw anything up. The culprit is a peculiarity in the function of the system. Saving an article as a draft---which should send it to my blog list only---will also send it to a mod for approval. I imagine some reason was imagined for requiring drafts to be approved by mods, but it's inconvenient because, once a mod approves the draft, it appears in the "Latest Activity" column on the home page.
That means folks can access it before I'm ready to publish it.
The reason it became more of a problem this time is because I had to deviate from my normal routine. Typically, once I've written and proofed my article on Word and collected all the art I'm going to use into a file, then I go the the blog page, cut-and-paste the article, add the art, give it one last proofing (not that that ever gets all the bugs out), and then send it over to a mod for publishing.
During that evolution, I usually save it as a draft twice---once to make sure I have it, in case of a power failure or something, and nearly every time I add the art, a glitch in the hyperlink system forces me to save it a second time.
Because I usually do it all---save the draft and proof it and publish it---in one session, the mod approval of the draft usually isn't a problem.
But "Mars or Bust" I had to do differently. I had to edit some of the art two or three times, and I saved it as a draft each time. (I found one piece of art I had to edit, then saved the draft, then found something else that needed fixing, and so forth.) Even so, that wouldn't have been a problem---except that I ran out of available time to proof the article again. So I had to keep it in draft status until I can get to it this morning. (Actually, right after I finish this note to you.)
Apparently on the moderator's end, nothing indicates that it's a draft one is approving, vice an article ready for publication. And because it was only drafts you approved this time (and no follow-on final article for publishing which usually happens), it didn't publish.
Comments
Thanks for the welcome! I've been 'lurking' and reading many a thread for quite a while!
How's that?
Rob, now maybe, with your godlike powers of moderation, you can help me with something.
As I typically do, when I post one column for approval, I go back to the previous one, correct all the errors/typos which escaped all of my prior proofreading, and submit that previous one for (re)approval.
When I posted my current Deck Log Entry (the Legion Quiz), I also reposted the previous "Mars or Bust!" entry, after cleaning it up. Usually the reposted column gets approved at the same time the new one is.
But for some reason, the "Mars or Bust!" column is still waiting approval. I don't know who the system decides what moderator gets what stuff to approve, but if you can give me an inkling on how to get "Mars or Bust!" reapproved, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Commander B
Rest easy, friend . . . you didn't screw anything up. The culprit is a peculiarity in the function of the system. Saving an article as a draft---which should send it to my blog list only---will also send it to a mod for approval. I imagine some reason was imagined for requiring drafts to be approved by mods, but it's inconvenient because, once a mod approves the draft, it appears in the "Latest Activity" column on the home page.
That means folks can access it before I'm ready to publish it.
The reason it became more of a problem this time is because I had to deviate from my normal routine. Typically, once I've written and proofed my article on Word and collected all the art I'm going to use into a file, then I go the the blog page, cut-and-paste the article, add the art, give it one last proofing (not that that ever gets all the bugs out), and then send it over to a mod for publishing.
During that evolution, I usually save it as a draft twice---once to make sure I have it, in case of a power failure or something, and nearly every time I add the art, a glitch in the hyperlink system forces me to save it a second time.
Because I usually do it all---save the draft and proof it and publish it---in one session, the mod approval of the draft usually isn't a problem.
But "Mars or Bust" I had to do differently. I had to edit some of the art two or three times, and I saved it as a draft each time. (I found one piece of art I had to edit, then saved the draft, then found something else that needed fixing, and so forth.) Even so, that wouldn't have been a problem---except that I ran out of available time to proof the article again. So I had to keep it in draft status until I can get to it this morning. (Actually, right after I finish this note to you.)
Apparently on the moderator's end, nothing indicates that it's a draft one is approving, vice an article ready for publication. And because it was only drafts you approved this time (and no follow-on final article for publishing which usually happens), it didn't publish.
So you didn't goof up, Rob. I just broke routine.
Best,
Commander B
We shall not see his like again...